Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2-Associated Sepsis
Caroline McKenna, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program, Chanu Rhee, Christina Chan, Claire N Shappell, Michael Klompas, Sanjat Kanjilal, Tom Chen — JAMA network open
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Importance: Efforts to quantify the burden of SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis have
been limited by inconsistent definitions and underrecognition of viral sepsis.
Objective: To describe the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2-associated
sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis using objective electronic clinical
criteria. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study
included adults hospitalized at 5 Massachusetts hospitals between…
Importance: Efforts to quantify the burden of SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis have
been limited by inconsistent definitions and underrecognition of viral sepsis.
Objective: To describe the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2-associated
sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis using objective electronic clinical
criteria. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study
included adults hospitalized at 5 Massachusetts hospitals between March 2020 and
November 2022. Exposures: SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis was defined as a positive
SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test and concurrent organ dysfunction (ie,
oxygen support above simple nasal cannula, vasopressors, elevated lactate level,
rise in creatine or bilirubin level, and/or decline in platelets). Presumed
bacterial sepsis was defined by modified US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention adult sepsis event criteria (ie, blood culture order, sustained
treatment with antibiotics, and organ dysfunction using identical thresholds as
for SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis). Main outcomes and measures: Trends in the
quarterly incidence (ie, proportion of hospitalizations) and in-hospital
mortality for SARS-CoV-2-associated and presumed bacterial sepsis were assessed
using negative binomial and logistic regression models. Results: This study
included 431 017 hospital encounters from 261 595 individuals (mean [SD] age
57.9 [19.8] years, 241 131 (55.9%) females, 286 397 [66.5%] from academic
hospital site). Of these encounters, 23 276 (5.4%) were from SARS-CoV-2, 6558
(1.5%) had SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis, and 30 604 patients (7.1%) had presumed
bacterial sepsis without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Crude in-hospital mortality for
SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis declined from 490 of 1469 (33.4%) in the first
quarter to 67 of 450 (14.9%) in the last (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88 [95%
CI, 0.85-0.90] per quarter). Crude mortality for presumed bacterial sepsis was
4451 of 30 604 patients (14.5%) and stable across quarters (aOR, 1.00 [95% CI,
0.99-1.01]). Medical record reviews of 200 SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalizations
confirmed electronic health record (EHR)-based SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis
criteria performed well relative to sepsis-3 criteria (90.6% [95% CI,
80.7%-96.5%] sensitivity; 91.2% [95% CI, 85.1%-95.4%] specificity). Conclusions
and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults,
SARS-CoV-2 accounted for approximately 1 in 6 cases of sepsis during the first
33 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In-hospital mortality rates for
SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis were high but declined over time and ultimately
were similar to presumed bacterial sepsis. These findings highlight the high
burden of SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis and demonstrate the utility of EHR-based
algorithms to conduct surveillance for viral and bacterial sepsis.
Weniger anzeigen
Ding-Shan Yuan, Fang Zhang, Jin-Hao Lin, Jin-Xiang Liu, Lei Zhang, Ping Zhou, Xu Dong, Xue Mei, Ying-Ping Tian, Zhao-Fen Lin — Annals of medicine
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Background: Septic shock is the development of sepsis to refractory circulatory
collapse and metabolic derangements, characterized by persistent hypotension and
increased lactate levels. Anisodamine hydrobromide (Ani HBr) is a Chinese
medicine used to improve blood flow in circulatory disorders. The purpose of
this study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of Ani HBr in…
Background: Septic shock is the development of sepsis to refractory circulatory
collapse and metabolic derangements, characterized by persistent hypotension and
increased lactate levels. Anisodamine hydrobromide (Ani HBr) is a Chinese
medicine used to improve blood flow in circulatory disorders. The purpose of
this study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of Ani HBr in the treatment
of patients with septic shock. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter,
randomized controlled trial focusing on patients with septic shock in 16
hospitals in China. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the
treatment group or the control group. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality.
The secondary outcomes included 7-day mortality, hospital mortality, hospital
length of stay, vasopressor-free days within 7 days, etc. These indicators were
measured and collected at 0, 6h, 24h, 48h, 72h and 7d after the diagnosis.
Results: Between September 2017 and March 2021, 404 subjects were enrolled. 203
subjects received Ani HBr and 201 subjects were assigned to the control group.
The treated group showed lower 28-day mortality than the control group.
Stratified analysis further showed significant differences in 28-day mortality
between the two groups for patients with a high level of illness severity. We
also observed significant differences in 7-day mortality, hospital mortality and
some other clinical indicators between the two groups. Conclusion: Ani HBr might
be an important adjuvant to conventional treatment to reduce 28-day mortality in
patients with septic shock. A large-scale prospective randomized multicenter
trial is warranted to confirm our results.
Weniger anzeigen
Jan Erik Berdal, Jimmy Whitworth, Magnus Nakrem Lyngbakken, Nina Handal, Olav Dalgard, Silje Bakken Jørgensen — Infectious diseases (London, England)
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Objective: To compare mortality and length of hospital stay between patients
with ESBL-producing E. coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) and patients with
non-ESBL E. coli BSIs. We also aimed at describing risk factors for
ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs and time to effective antibiotic treatment for the
two groups. Methods: A retrospective case-control study among adults…
Objective: To compare mortality and length of hospital stay between patients
with ESBL-producing E. coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) and patients with
non-ESBL E. coli BSIs. We also aimed at describing risk factors for
ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs and time to effective antibiotic treatment for the
two groups. Methods: A retrospective case-control study among adults admitted
between 2014 and 2021 to a Norwegian University Hospital. Results: A total of
468 E. coli BSI episodes from 441 patients were included (234 BSIs each in the
ESBL- and non-ESBL group). Among the ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs, 10.9% (25/230)
deaths occurred within 30 days compared to 9.0% (21/234) in the non-ESBL group.
The adjusted 30-day mortality OR was 1.6 (95% CI 0.7-3.7, p = 0.248). Effective
antibiotic treatment was administered within 24 hours to 55.2% (129/234) in the
ESBL-group compared to 86.8% (203/234) in the non-ESBL group. Among BSIs of
urinary tract origin (n = 317), the median length of hospital stay increased by
two days in the ESBL group (six versus four days, p < 0.001). No significant
difference in the length of hospital stay was found for other sources of
infection (n = 151), with a median of seven versus six days (p = 0.550) in the
ESBL- and non-ESBL groups, respectively. Conclusion: There was no statistically
significant difference in 30-day mortality in ESBL-producing E. coli compared to
non-ESBL E. coli BSI, despite a delay in the administration of an effective
antibiotic in the former group. ESBL-production was associated with an increased
length of stay in BSIs of urinary tract origin.
Weniger anzeigen
Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Logan Morgan Ward, Mads Lause Mogensen, Morten Breinholt Søvsø, Tim Alex Lindskou — JAMA network open
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Importance: Early warning scores (EWSs) are designed for in-hospital use but are
widely used in the prehospital field, especially in select groups of patients
potentially at high risk. To be useful for paramedics in daily prehospital
clinical practice, evaluations are needed of the predictive value of EWSs based
on first measured vital signs on…
Importance: Early warning scores (EWSs) are designed for in-hospital use but are
widely used in the prehospital field, especially in select groups of patients
potentially at high risk. To be useful for paramedics in daily prehospital
clinical practice, evaluations are needed of the predictive value of EWSs based
on first measured vital signs on scene in large cohorts covering unselected
patients using ambulance services. Objective: To validate EWSs‘ ability to
predict mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) stay in an unselected cohort of
adult patients who used ambulances. Design, setting, and participants: This
prognostic study conducted a validation based on a cohort of adult patients
(aged ≥18 years) who used ambulances in the North Denmark Region from July 1,
2016, to December 31, 2020. EWSs (National Early Warning Score 2 [NEWS2],
modified NEWS score without temperature [mNEWS], Quick Sepsis Related Organ
Failure Assessment [qSOFA], Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System [RETTS],
and Danish Emergency Process Triage [DEPT]) were calculated using first vital
signs measured by ambulance personnel. Data were analyzed from September 2022
through May 2023. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was
30-day-mortality. Secondary outcomes were 1-day-mortality and ICU admission.
Discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating
characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC).
Results: There were 107 569 unique patients (52 650 females [48.9%]; median
[IQR] age, 65 [45-77] years) from the entire cohort of 219 323 patients who used
ambulance services, among whom 119 992 patients (54.7%) had called the Danish
national emergency number. NEWS2, mNEWS, RETTS, and DEPT performed similarly
concerning 30-day mortality (AUROC range, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.66-0.68] for DEPT to
0.68 [95% CI, 0.68-0.69] for mNEWS), while qSOFA had lower performance (AUROC,
0.59 [95% CI, 0.59-0.60]; P vs other scores < .001). All EWSs had low AUPRCs,
ranging from 0.09 (95% CI, 0.09-0.09) for qSOFA to 0.14 (95% CI, 0.13-0.14) for
mNEWS.. Concerning 1-day mortality and ICU admission NEWS2, mNEWS, RETTS, and
DEPT performed similarly, with AUROCs ranging from 0.72 (95% CI, 0.71-0.73) for
RETTS to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.76) for DEPT in 1-day mortality and 0.66 (95% CI,
0.65-0.67) for RETTS to 0.68 (95% CI, 0.67-0.69) for mNEWS in ICU admission, and
all EWSs had low AUPRCs. These ranged from 0.02 (95% CI, 0.02-0.03) for qSOFA to
0.04 (95% CI, 0.04-0.04) for DEPT in 1-day mortality and 0.03 (95% CI,
0.03-0.03) for qSOFA to 0.05 (95% CI, 0.04-0.05) for DEPT in ICU admission.
Conclusions and relevance: This study found that EWSs in daily clinical use in
emergency medical settings performed moderately in the prehospital field among
unselected patients who used ambulances when assessed based on initial
measurements of vital signs. These findings suggest the need of appropriate
triage and early identification of patients at low and high risk with new and
better EWSs also suitable for prehospital use.
Weniger anzeigen
Erik Solligård, Hallie C Prescott, Jan Kristian Damås, Lise Tuset Gustad, Nina Vibeche Skei, Randi Marie Mohus, Stian Lydersen, Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen — Infection
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Background: Few studies have reported on mortality beyond one year after sepsis.
We aim to describe trends in short- and long-term mortality among patients
admitted with sepsis, and to describe the association between clinical
characteristics and mortality for improved monitoring, treatment and prognosis.
Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years admitted to all Norwegian hospitals (2008-2021)
with…
Background: Few studies have reported on mortality beyond one year after sepsis.
We aim to describe trends in short- and long-term mortality among patients
admitted with sepsis, and to describe the association between clinical
characteristics and mortality for improved monitoring, treatment and prognosis.
Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years admitted to all Norwegian hospitals (2008-2021)
with a first sepsis episode were identified using Norwegian Patient Registry and
International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. Sepsis was
classified as implicit (known infection site plus organ dysfunction), explicit
(unknown infection site), or COVID-19-related sepsis. The outcome was all-cause
mortality. We describe age-standardized 30-day, 90-day, 1-, 5- and 10-year
mortality for each admission year and estimated the annual percentage change
with 95% confidence interval (CI). The association between clinical
characteristics and all-cause mortality is reported as hazard ratios (HRs)
adjusted for age, sex and calendar year in Cox regression. Results: The study
included 222,832 patients, of whom 127,059 (57.1%) had implicit, 92,928 (41.7%)
had explicit, and 2,845 (1.3%) had COVID-19-related sepsis (data from 2020 and
2021). Trends in overall age-standardized 30-day, 90-day, 1- and 5-year
mortality decreased by 0.29 (95% CI – 0.39 to – 0.19), 0.43 (95% CI – 0.56 to –
0.29), 0.61 (95% CI – 0.73 to – 0.49) and 0.66 (95% CI – 0.84 to – 0.48) percent
per year, respectively. The decrease was observed for all infections sites but
was largest among patients with respiratory tract infections. Implicit, explicit
and COVID-19-related sepsis had largely similar overall mortality, with explicit
sepsis having an adjusted HR of 0.980 (95% CI 0.969 to 0.991) and
COVID-19-related sepsis an adjusted HR of 0.916 (95% CI 0.836 to 1.003) compared
to implicit sepsis. Patients with respiratory tract infections have somewhat
higher mortality than those with other infection sites. Number of comorbidities
was positively associated with mortality, but mortality varied considerably
between different comorbidities. Similarly, number of acute organ dysfunctions
was strongly associated with mortality, whereas the risk varied for each type of
organ dysfunction. Conclusion: Overall mortality has declined over the past 14
years among patients with a first sepsis admission. Comorbidity, site of
infection, and acute organ dysfunction are patient characteristics that are
associated with mortality. This could inform health care workers and raise the
awareness toward subgroups of patients that needs particular attention to
improve long-term mortality.
Weniger anzeigen
Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Donna Mason, Endrias Ergetu, Kathryn Wilks, Kristen Gibbons, Lyndell Redpath, Michael Rice, Paul Lane, Robert Seaton — BMJ open
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Objective: To determine if the introduction of an emergency department (ED)
sepsis screening tool and management bundle affects antibiotic prescribing and
use. Design: Multicentre, cohort, before-and-after study design. Setting: Three
tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia (median bed size 543, range
520-742). Participants: Adult patients, presenting to the ED with symptoms and
signs suggestive of sepsis…
Objective: To determine if the introduction of an emergency department (ED)
sepsis screening tool and management bundle affects antibiotic prescribing and
use. Design: Multicentre, cohort, before-and-after study design. Setting: Three
tertiary hospitals in Queensland, Australia (median bed size 543, range
520-742). Participants: Adult patients, presenting to the ED with symptoms and
signs suggestive of sepsis who had blood cultures collected. These participants
were further assessed and stratified as having septic shock, sepsis or infection
alone, using Sepsis-3 definitions. The study dates were 1 July 2017-31 March
2020. Intervention: The breakthrough series collaborative ‚Could this be
Sepsis?‘ Programme, aimed at embedding a sepsis screening tool and treatment
bundle with weighted-incidence syndromic combined antibiogram-derived antibiotic
guidelines in EDs. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the rate of
empirical prescriptions adherent to antibiotic guidelines during the ED
encounter. Secondary outcomes included the empirical prescriptions considered
appropriate, effective antibiotics administered within 3 hours and assessment of
harm measures. Results: Of 2591 eligible patients, 721 were randomly selected:
241 in the baseline phase and 480 in the post-intervention phase. The rates of
guideline adherence were 54.0% and 59.5%, respectively (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.41
(95% CI 1.00, 1.98)). As compared with baseline, there was an increase in the
rates of appropriate antibiotic prescription after bundle implementation (69.9%
vs 57.1%, aOR 1.92 (95% CI 1.37, 2.68)). There were no differences between the
baseline and post-intervention groups with respect to time to effective
antibiotics, adverse effects or ED rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use.
Conclusion and relevance: The use of an ED sepsis screening tool and management
bundle was associated with an improvement in the rates of appropriate antibiotic
prescription without evidence of adverse effects.
Weniger anzeigen
Diagnostische Aspekte der Sepsis, Effektivität von Qualitätsverbesserungsmaßnahmen, Therapeutische Aspekte der Sepsis
Keywords:
accident &,emergency medicine, adverse events, Guidelines, Infectious diseases, microbiology, protocols&, quality in health care
Kommentar
Does Prehospital Suspicion of Sepsis Shorten Time to Administration of Antibiotics in the Emergency Department? A Retrospective Study in One University Hospital
Alexander Daniel Shapeton, Clemens Kill, Joachim Riße, Matthias Bollinger, Matthias Kohl, Nadja Frère, Weronika Schary — Journal of clinical medicine
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Early treatment is the mainstay of sepsis therapy. We suspected that early
recognition of sepsis by prehospital healthcare providers may shorten the time
for antibiotic administration in the emergency department. We retrospectively
evaluated all patients above 18 years of age who were diagnosed with sepsis or
severe infection in our emergency department between 2018…
Early treatment is the mainstay of sepsis therapy. We suspected that early
recognition of sepsis by prehospital healthcare providers may shorten the time
for antibiotic administration in the emergency department. We retrospectively
evaluated all patients above 18 years of age who were diagnosed with sepsis or
severe infection in our emergency department between 2018 and 2020. We recorded
the suspected diagnosis at the time of presentation, the type of referring
healthcare provider, and the time until initiation of antibiotic treatment.
Differences between groups were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum
test. Of the 277 patients who were diagnosed with severe infection or sepsis in
the emergency department, an infection was suspected in 124 (44.8%) patients,
and sepsis was suspected in 31 (11.2%) patients by referring healthcare
providers. Time to initiation of antibiotic treatment was shorter in patients
where sepsis or infection had been suspected prior to arrival for both patients
with severe infections (p = 0.022) and sepsis (p = 0.004). Given the
well-described outcome benefits of early sepsis therapy, recognition of sepsis
needs to be improved. Appropriate scores should be used as part of routine
patient assessment to reduce the time to antibiotic administration and improve
patient outcomes.
Weniger anzeigen
Benjamin Bowe, Yan Xie, Ziyad Al-Aly — Nature medicine
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can lead
to postacute sequelae in multiple organ systems, but evidence is mostly limited
to the first year postinfection. We built a cohort of 138,818 individuals with
SARS-CoV-2 infection and 5,985,227 noninfected control group from the US
Department of Veterans Affairs and followed them for 2…
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can lead
to postacute sequelae in multiple organ systems, but evidence is mostly limited
to the first year postinfection. We built a cohort of 138,818 individuals with
SARS-CoV-2 infection and 5,985,227 noninfected control group from the US
Department of Veterans Affairs and followed them for 2 years to estimate the
risks of death and 80 prespecified postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)
according to care setting during the acute phase of infection. The increased
risk of death was not significant beyond 6 months after infection among
nonhospitalized but remained significantly elevated through the 2 years in
hospitalized individuals. Within the 80 prespecified sequelae, 69% and 35% of
them became not significant at 2 years after infection among nonhospitalized and
hospitalized individuals, respectively. Cumulatively at 2 years, PASC
contributed 80.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 71.6-89.6) and 642.8 (95% CI:
596.9-689.3) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 1,000 persons among
nonhospitalized and hospitalized individuals; 25.3% (18.9-31.0%) and 21.3%
(18.2-24.5%) of the cumulative 2-year DALYs in nonhospitalized and hospitalized
were from the second year. In sum, while risks of many sequelae declined 2 years
after infection, the substantial cumulative burden of health loss due to PASC
calls for attention to the care needs of people with long-term health effects
due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Weniger anzeigen
Efficacy of a novel patient-focused intervention aimed at increasing adherence to guideline-based preventive measures in asplenic patients: the PrePSS trial
Erik Farin-Glattacker, Johannes Camp, Manuela Glattacker, Marianne Bayrhuber, Natascha Anka, Siegbert Rieg, Valerie Heine — Infection
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether a novel intervention improves the adherence to
guideline-based preventive measures in asplenic patients at risk of
post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS). Methods: We used a prospective controlled,
two-armed historical control group design to compare a novel, health action
process approach (HAPA)-based telephonic intervention involving both patients
and their general practitioners to usual care.…
Purpose: To determine whether a novel intervention improves the adherence to
guideline-based preventive measures in asplenic patients at risk of
post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS). Methods: We used a prospective controlled,
two-armed historical control group design to compare a novel, health action
process approach (HAPA)-based telephonic intervention involving both patients
and their general practitioners to usual care. Eligible patients were identified
in cooperation with the insurance provider AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Patients with anatomic asplenia (n = 106) were prospectively enrolled and
compared to a historical control group (n = 113). Comparisons were done using a
propensity-score-based overlap-weighting model. Adherence to preventive measures
was quantified by the study-specific ‚Preventing PSS score‘ (PrePSS score) which
includes pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccination status, the availability of
a stand-by antibiotic and a medical alert card. Results: At six months after the
intervention, we estimated an effect of 3.96 (95% CI 3.68-4.24) points on the
PrePSS score scale (range 0-10) with mean PrePSS scores of 3.73 and 7.70 in
control and intervention group, respectively. Substantial improvement was seen
in all subcategories of the PrePSS score with the highest absolute gains in the
availability of stand-by antibiotics. We graded the degree of participation by
the general practitioner (no contact, short contact, full intervention) and
noted that the observed effect was only marginally influenced by the degree of
physician participation. Conclusions: Patients who had received the intervention
exhibited a significantly higher adherence to guideline-based preventive
measures compared to the control group. These data suggest that widespread
adoption of this pragmatic intervention may improve management of asplenic
patients. Health insurance provider-initiated identification of at-risk patients
combined with a patient-focused intervention may serve as a blueprint for a wide
range of other preventive efforts leading to patient empowerment and ultimately
to better adherence to standards of care.
Weniger anzeigen
Chunyao Wang, Jinmin Peng, Li Weng, Peng Yin, Run Dong, Shan Li, Wei Jiang, Wei Liu, Xiaoyun Hu, Yan Chen — Annals of intensive care
★★★★☆
2023
Abstract
Background: The scarcity of sepsis epidemiologic data from most low- and
middle-income countries (LMICs) hampered estimation of regional and global
burden of the disease, and provided limited guidance for policy makers. We aimed
to characterize and analyze the temporal trends of sepsis-related mortality in
China, by population groups, underlying causes of death, geographic regions,…
Background: The scarcity of sepsis epidemiologic data from most low- and
middle-income countries (LMICs) hampered estimation of regional and global
burden of the disease, and provided limited guidance for policy makers. We aimed
to characterize and analyze the temporal trends of sepsis-related mortality in
China, by population groups, underlying causes of death, geographic regions, and
sociodemographic index (SDI) levels. Methods: Sepsis-related deaths were
identified from the National Mortality Surveillance System (NMSS) of China from
2006 to 2020. Trends of sepsis-related mortality and years of life lost (YLLs),
stratified by age, sex, underlying diseases, and regions were analyzed using the
Jointpoint regression analysis. We investigated the association of SDI with
trends of sepsis-related mortality. Results: In 2020, sepsis was estimated to be
responsible for 986,929 deaths and 17.1 million YLLs in China. Age-standardized
sepsis-related mortality significantly declined from 130.2 (95%CI, 129.4-131)
per 100,000 population in 2006 to 76.6 (76.3-76.9) in 2020. Age-standardized
YLLs decreased from 2172.7 (2169.4-2176) per 100,000 population in 2006 to 1271
(1269.8-1272.2) in 2020. Substantial variations of sepsis-related mortality and
YLLs were observed between population groups and regions, with higher burden in
males, the elderly, and western China. An inverse relation was noted between SDI
and sepsis-related mortality or YLLs. Conclusions: Despite declining trends of
age-standardized mortality and YLLs of sepsis in China, significant disparities
between population groups and regions highlight a need for targeted policies and
measures to close the gaps and improve the outcome of sepsis.
Weniger anzeigen