Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
André Scherag, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Christine Pausch, Horst Christian Vollmar, Jochen Gensichen, Konrad Reinhart, Konrad Schmidt, Paul Thiel, Viola Bahr, Yasser Sakr — Deutsches Arzteblatt international
★★★★☆
2020
Abstract
Background: There have not yet been any prospective registry studies in Germany
with active investigation of the long-term survival of patients with sepsis.
Methods: The Jena Sepsis Registry (JSR) included all patients with a diagnosis
of sepsis in the four intensive care units of Jena University Hospital from
January 2011 to December 2015. Long-term…
Background: There have not yet been any prospective registry studies in Germany
with active investigation of the long-term survival of patients with sepsis.
Methods: The Jena Sepsis Registry (JSR) included all patients with a diagnosis
of sepsis in the four intensive care units of Jena University Hospital from
January 2011 to December 2015. Long-term survival 6-48 months after diagnosis
was documented by asking the treating general practitioners. The survival times
were studied with Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox regressions were calculated to
show associations between possible predictors and survival time. Results: 1975
patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The mean time of observation
was 730 days. For 96.4% of the queries to the general practitioners, information
on long-term survival was available. Mortality in the intensive care unit was
34% (95% confidence interval [32; 37]), and in-hospital mortality was 45% [42;
47]. The overall mortality six months after diagnosis was 59% [57; 62], the
overall mortality 48 months after diagnosis was 74% [72; 78]. Predictors of
shorter survival were age, nosocomial origin of sepsis, diabetes,
cerebrovascular disease, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, and renal
replacement therapy. Conclusion: The nearly 75% mortality four years after
diagnosis indicates that changes are needed both in the acute treatment of
patients with sepsis and in their multi-sector long-term care. The applicability
of these findings may be limited by their having been obtained in a single
center.
Weniger anzeigen
Time to Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
Carolyn S Calfee, Kirsten N Kangelaris, Margaret C Fang, Michael A Matthay, Priya A Prasad, Yumiko Abe-Jones — Critical Care Medicine
★★★★☆
2020
Abstract
Objectives: Early identification of sepsis is critical to improving patient
outcomes. Impact of the new sepsis definition (Sepsis-3) on timing of
recognition in the emergency department has not been evaluated. Our study
objective was to compare time to meeting systemic inflammatory response syndrome
(Sepsis-2) criteria, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Sepsis-3) criteria,
and quick Sequential Organ…
Objectives: Early identification of sepsis is critical to improving patient
outcomes. Impact of the new sepsis definition (Sepsis-3) on timing of
recognition in the emergency department has not been evaluated. Our study
objective was to compare time to meeting systemic inflammatory response syndrome
(Sepsis-2) criteria, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Sepsis-3) criteria,
and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria using electronic health
record data. Design: Retrospective, observational study. Setting: The emergency
department at the University of California, San Francisco. Patients: Emergency
department encounters between June 2012 and December 2016 for patients greater
than or equal to 18 years old with blood cultures ordered, IV antibiotic
receipt, and identification with sepsis via systemic inflammatory response
syndrome or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment within 72 hours of emergency
department presentation. Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: We
analyzed timestamped electronic health record data from 16,612 encounters
identified as sepsis by greater than or equal to 2 systemic inflammatory
response syndrome criteria or a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
greater than or equal to 2. The primary outcome was time from emergency
department presentation to meeting greater than or equal to 2 systemic
inflammatory response syndrome criteria, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
greater than or equal to 2, and/or greater than or equal to 2 quick Sequential
Organ Failure Assessment criteria. There were 9,087 patients (54.7%) that met
systemic inflammatory response syndrome-first a median of 26 minutes
post-emergency department presentation (interquartile range, 0-109 min), with
83.1% meeting Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria a median of 118
minutes later (interquartile range, 44-401 min). There were 7,037 patients
(42.3%) that met Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-first, a median of 113
minutes post-emergency department presentation (interquartile range, 60-251
min). Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was met in 46.4% of patients a
median of 351 minutes post-emergency department presentation (interquartile
range, 67-1,165 min). Adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were 39% greater in
patients who met systemic inflammatory response syndrome-first compared with
those who met Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-first (odds ratio, 1.39; 95%
CI, 1.20-1.61). Conclusions: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment initially identified distinct populations.
Using systemic inflammatory response syndrome resulted in earlier electronic
health record sepsis identification in greater than 50% of patients. Using
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment alone may delay identification. Using
systemic inflammatory response syndrome alone may lead to missed sepsis
presenting as acute organ dysfunction. Thus, a combination of inflammatory
(systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and organ dysfunction (Sequential
Organ Failure Assessment) criteria may enhance timely electronic health
record-based sepsis identification.
Weniger anzeigen
Aathira Santhosh, Ibijoke Oke, Kimberly L Sciarretta, Kristen P Finne, Meghan E Pennini, Michael Collier, Nicole Sowers, Saurabh Chavan, Steven Q Simpson, Timothy G Buchman — Critical Care Medicine
★★★★☆
2020
Abstract
Objectives: To provide contemporary estimates of the burdens (costs and
mortality) associated with acute inpatient Medicare beneficiary admissions for
sepsis. Design: Analysis of paid Medicare claims via the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services DataLink Project. Setting: All U.S. acute care hospitals,
excluding federally operated hospitals (Veterans Administration and Defense
Health Agency). Patients: All Medicare…
Objectives: To provide contemporary estimates of the burdens (costs and
mortality) associated with acute inpatient Medicare beneficiary admissions for
sepsis. Design: Analysis of paid Medicare claims via the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services DataLink Project. Setting: All U.S. acute care hospitals,
excluding federally operated hospitals (Veterans Administration and Defense
Health Agency). Patients: All Medicare beneficiaries, 2012-2018, with an
inpatient admission including one or more explicit sepsis codes. Interventions:
None. Measurements and main results: Total inpatient hospital and skilled
nursing facility admission counts, costs, and mortality over time. From calendar
year (CY)2012-CY2018, the total number of Medicare Part A/B (fee-for-service)
beneficiaries with an inpatient hospital admission associated with an explicit
sepsis code rose from 811,644 to 1,136,889. The total cost of inpatient hospital
admission including an explicit sepsis code for those beneficiaries in those
calendar years rose from $17,792,657,303 to $22,439,794,212. The total cost of
skilled nursing facility care in the 90 days subsequent to an inpatient hospital
discharge that included an explicit sepsis code for Medicare Part A/B rose from
$3,931,616,160 to $5,623,862,486 over that same interval. Precise costs are not
available for Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) patients. Using available
federal data sources, we estimated the aggregate cost of inpatient admissions
and skilled nursing facility admissions for Medicare Advantage patients to have
risen from $6.0 to $13.4 billion over the CY2012-CY2018 interval. Combining data
for fee-for-service beneficiaries and estimates for Medicare Advantage
beneficiaries, we estimate the total inpatient admission sepsis cost and any
subsequent skilled nursing facility admission for all (fee-for-service and
Medicare Advantage) Medicare patients to have risen from $27.7 to $41.5 billion.
Contemporary 6-month mortality rates for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries
with a sepsis inpatient admission remain high: for septic shock, approximately
60%; for severe sepsis, approximately 36%; for sepsis attributed to a specific
organism, approximately 31%; and for unspecified sepsis, approximately 27%.
Conclusion: Sepsis remains common, costly to treat, and presages significant
mortality for Medicare beneficiaries.
Weniger anzeigen
A Cassini, B Allegranzi, C Fleischmann-Struzek, K E Rudd, K Reinhart, L Mellhammar, N Rose, P Schlattmann — Intensive care medicine
★★★★☆
2020
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the global burden of sepsis in hospitalized adults by
updating and expanding a systematic review and meta-analysis and to compare
findings with recent Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) sepsis
estimates. Methods: Thirteen electronic databases were searched for studies on
population-level sepsis incidence defined according to clinical criteria
(Sepsis-1, -2: severe…
Purpose: To investigate the global burden of sepsis in hospitalized adults by
updating and expanding a systematic review and meta-analysis and to compare
findings with recent Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) sepsis
estimates. Methods: Thirteen electronic databases were searched for studies on
population-level sepsis incidence defined according to clinical criteria
(Sepsis-1, -2: severe sepsis criteria, or sepsis-3: sepsis criteria) or relevant
ICD-codes. The search of the original systematic review was updated for studies
published 05/2015-02/2019 and complemented by a search targeting low- or
middle-income-country (LMIC) studies published 01/1979-02/2019. We performed a
random-effects meta-analysis with incidence of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis
and proportion of deaths among these sepsis cases as outcomes. Results: Of 4746
results, 28 met the inclusion criteria. 21 studies contributed data for the
meta-analysis and were pooled with 30 studies from the original meta-analysis.
Pooled incidence was 189 [95% CI 133, 267] hospital-treated sepsis cases per
100,000 person-years. An estimated 26.7% [22.9, 30.7] of sepsis patients died.
Estimated incidence of ICU-treated sepsis was 58 [42, 81] per 100,000
person-years, of which 41.9% [95% CI 36.2, 47.7] died prior to hospital
discharge. There was a considerably higher incidence of hospital-treated sepsis
observed after 2008 (+ 46% compared to the overall time frame). Conclusions:
Compared to results from the IHME study, we found an approximately 50% lower
incidence of hospital-treated sepsis. The majority of studies included were
based on administrative data, thus limiting our ability to assess temporal
trends and regional differences. The incidence of sepsis remains unknown for the
vast majority of LMICs, highlighting the urgent need for improved
epidemiological sepsis surveillance.
Weniger anzeigen
Alessandro Cassini, Benedetta Allegranzi, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Felix Reichert, Hiroki Saito, Robby Markwart, Sara Tomczyk, Thomas Harder, Tim Eckmanns — Intensive care medicine
★★★★☆
2020
Abstract
Purpose: Sepsis is recognized as a global public health problem, but the
proportion due to hospital-acquired infections remains unclear. We aimed to
summarize the epidemiological evidence related to the burden of
hospital-acquired (HA) and ICU-acquired (ICU-A) sepsis. Methods: We searched
MEDLINE, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from 01/2000 to 03/2018. We
included studies conducted…
Purpose: Sepsis is recognized as a global public health problem, but the
proportion due to hospital-acquired infections remains unclear. We aimed to
summarize the epidemiological evidence related to the burden of
hospital-acquired (HA) and ICU-acquired (ICU-A) sepsis. Methods: We searched
MEDLINE, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from 01/2000 to 03/2018. We
included studies conducted hospital-wide or in intensive care units (ICUs),
including neonatal units (NICUs), with data on the incidence/prevalence of HA
and ICU-A sepsis and the proportion of community and hospital/ICU origin. We did
random-effects meta-analyses to obtain pooled estimates; inter-study
heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Results: Of the 13,239 studies
identified, 51 met the inclusion criteria; 22 were from low- and middle-income
countries. Twenty-eight studies were conducted in ICUs, 13 in NICUs, and ten
hospital-wide. The proportion of HA sepsis among all hospital-treated sepsis
cases was 23.6% (95% CI 17-31.8%, range 16-36.4%). In the ICU, 24.4% (95% CI
16.7-34.2%, range 10.3-42.5%) of cases of sepsis with organ dysfunction were
acquired during ICU stay and 48.7% (95% CI 38.3-59.3%, range 18.7-69.4%) had a
hospital origin. The pooled hospital incidence of HA sepsis with organ
dysfunction per 1000 patients was 9.3 (95% CI 7.3-11.9, range 2-20.6)). In the
ICU, the pooled incidence of HA sepsis with organ dysfunction per 1000 patients
was 56.5 (95% CI 35-90.2, range 9.2-254.4) and it was particularly high in
NICUs. Mortality of ICU patients with HA sepsis with organ dysfunction was 52.3%
(95% CI 43.4-61.1%, range 30.1-64.6%). There was a significant inter-study
heterogeneity. Risk of bias was low to moderate in ICU-based studies and
moderate to high in hospital-wide and NICU studies. Conclusion: HA sepsis is of
major public health importance, and the burden is particularly high in ICUs.
There is an urgent need to improve the implementation of global and local
infection prevention and management strategies to reduce its high burden among
hospitalized patients.
Weniger anzeigen
Bronagh Blackwood, Bronwen Connolly, Hallie C Prescott, Karen Choong, Linda L Chlan, Luigi Ferrucci, Paul Dark, Simon Finfer, Theodore J Iwashyna, Thierry Calandra — American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
★★★★☆
2019
Abstract
An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors
experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological
impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health
deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute
renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on
shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting…
An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors
experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological
impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health
deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute
renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on
shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting longer-term recovery.
To address this unmet need, the International Sepsis Forum convened a colloquium
in February 2018 titled „Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship.“ The
goals were to identify gaps and limitations of current research and shorter- and
longer-term priorities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship.
Twenty-six experts from eight countries participated. The top short-term
priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting
were to better leverage existing databases for research, develop and disseminate
educational resources on postsepsis morbidity, and partner with sepsis survivors
to define and achieve research priorities. The top longer-term priorities were
to study mechanisms of long-term morbidity through large cohort studies with
deep phenotyping, build a harmonized global sepsis registry to facilitate
enrollment in cohorts and trials, and complete detailed longitudinal follow-up
to characterize the diversity of recovery experiences. This perspective reviews
colloquium discussions, the identified priorities, and current initiatives to
address them.
Weniger anzeigen
Influenza vaccination and 1-year risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, and mortality among intensive care unit survivors aged 65 years or older: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Christian Fynbo Christiansen, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Lars Pedersen, Morten Schmidt, Reimar Wernich Thomsen — Intensive care medicine
★★★★☆
2019
Abstract
Purpose: We examined whether influenza vaccination affects 1-year risk of
myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, and death among
intensive care unit (ICU) survivors aged ≥ 65 years. Methods: Danish Intensive
Care Database data on all elderly ( ≥ 65 years) patients hospitalized in Danish
ICUs in the period 2005-2015, and subsequently discharged, were…
Purpose: We examined whether influenza vaccination affects 1-year risk of
myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, and death among
intensive care unit (ICU) survivors aged ≥ 65 years. Methods: Danish Intensive
Care Database data on all elderly ( ≥ 65 years) patients hospitalized in Danish
ICUs in the period 2005-2015, and subsequently discharged, were linked with data
from other medical registries, including data on uptake of the seasonal
influenza vaccine. We computed these patients‘ 1-year risk of hospitalization
for myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or pneumonia, and their 1-year
risk of all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals
(CIs) were computed using Cox proportional hazards regression, with adjustment
and propensity score matching applied to handle confounding. Results: The study
included 89,818 ICU survivors. The influenza vaccinated patients (n = 34,871,
39%) were older, had more chronic diseases, and used more prescription
medications than the unvaccinated patients. Adjusted 1-year mortality was
decreased among the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated patients (19.3% versus
18.8%; adjusted HR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.95). Influenza vaccination was also
associated with a decreased risk of stroke (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI
0.78-0.92), but only a small, non-significantly decreased risk of myocardial
infarction (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI 0.83-1.03). There was no association
between vaccination and subsequent hospitalization for heart failure or
pneumonia. Propensity score matched analyses confirmed these findings.
Conclusions: Compared with the unvaccinated ICU survivors, the influenza
vaccinated ICU survivors had a lower 1-year risk of stroke and a lower 1-year
risk of death, whereas no substantial association was observed for the risk of
hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. Our
findings support influenza vaccination of individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Keywords:
Cardiovascular diseases, Cohort studies, Infection, Influenza vaccines,
Intensive care, Mortality
Weniger anzeigen
Derek C Angus, Elizabeth R Alpern, Gary S Phillips, Idris V R Evans, Kathleen M Terry, Marcus E Friedrich, Margaret M Parker, Mitchell M Levy, Niranjan Kissoon, Stanley Lemeshow — JAMA
★★★★☆
2018
Abstract
Importance: The death of a pediatric patient with sepsis motivated New York to
mandate statewide sepsis treatment in 2013. The mandate included a 1-hour bundle
of blood cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a 20-mL/kg intravenous fluid
bolus. Whether completing the bundle elements within 1 hour improves outcomes is
unclear. Objective: To determine the risk-adjusted association…
Importance: The death of a pediatric patient with sepsis motivated New York to
mandate statewide sepsis treatment in 2013. The mandate included a 1-hour bundle
of blood cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a 20-mL/kg intravenous fluid
bolus. Whether completing the bundle elements within 1 hour improves outcomes is
unclear. Objective: To determine the risk-adjusted association between
completing the 1-hour pediatric sepsis bundle and individual bundle elements
with in-hospital mortality. Design, settings, and participants: Statewide cohort
study conducted from April 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, in emergency
departments, inpatient units, and intensive care units across New York State. A
total of 1179 patients aged 18 years and younger with sepsis and septic shock
reported to the New York State Department of Health who had a sepsis protocol
initiated were included. Exposures: Completion of a 1-hour sepsis bundle within
1 hour compared with not completing the 1-hour sepsis bundle within 1 hour. Main
outcomes and measures: Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 1179
patients with sepsis reported at 54 hospitals (mean [SD] age, 7.2 [6.2] years;
male, 54.2%; previously healthy, 44.5%; diagnosed as having shock, 68.8%), 139
(11.8%) died. The entire sepsis bundle was completed in 1 hour in 294 patients
(24.9%). Antibiotics were administered to 798 patients (67.7%), blood cultures
were obtained in 740 patients (62.8%), and the fluid bolus was completed in 548
patients (46.5%) within 1 hour. Completion of the entire bundle within 1 hour
was associated with lower risk-adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (odds
ratio [OR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93], P = .02; predicted risk difference
[RD], 4.0% [95% CI, 0.9% to 7.0%]). However, completion of each individual
bundle element within 1 hour was not significantly associated with lower
risk-adjusted mortality (blood culture: OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.06], P =
.10; RD, 2.6% [95% CI, -0.5% to 5.7%]; antibiotics: OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.55 to
1.12], P = .18; RD, 2.1% [95% CI, -1.1% to 5.2%], and fluid bolus: OR, 0.88 [95%
CI, 0.56 to 1.37], P = .56; RD, 1.1% [95% CI, -2.6% to 4.8%]). Conclusions and
relevance: In New York State following a mandate for sepsis care, completion of
a sepsis bundle within 1 hour compared with not completing the 1-hour sepsis
bundle within 1 hour was associated with lower risk-adjusted in-hospital
mortality among patients with pediatric sepsis and septic shock.
Weniger anzeigen
Antje Freytag, Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Constanze Rossmann, Cornelia Betsch, Horst C Vollmar, Konrad Reinhart, Mathias W Pletz, Ole Wichmann, Sarah Eitze, vaccination60+ study group — Critical care (London, England)
★★★★☆
2018
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency requiring early
diagnosis and urgent treatment. Knowledge is crucial, especially in major risk
groups such as the elderly. We therefore assessed sophisticated knowledge about
sepsis in the German elderly population. Methods: A telephone survey was carried
out with a representative sample of 701 Germans from 16 federal…
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency requiring early
diagnosis and urgent treatment. Knowledge is crucial, especially in major risk
groups such as the elderly. We therefore assessed sophisticated knowledge about
sepsis in the German elderly population. Methods: A telephone survey was carried
out with a representative sample of 701 Germans from 16 federal states and a
separate cohort of 700 participants from Thuringia, all aged ≥ 60 years. Sepsis
knowledge was assessed via a 10-item questionnaire. Sociodemographic data and
health information sources were assessed to identify determinants of sepsis
knowledge. Results: Of the participants, 88.6% had heard the term „sepsis“
before; however, 50% of these failed to define sepsis correctly. Even if the
knowledge of symptoms was moderately good, most participants could not correctly
identify causes of sepsis and underestimated its incidence. Only a minority was
aware that immunization may prevent sepsis. Regressions revealed that being
younger, better educated and living in rural areas predicted higher levels of
sepsis knowledge. Pharmacists were a relevant source of sepsis information.
Conclusions: Despite overall awareness of sepsis, the understanding of its risk
factors, symptoms and prevention is low in the elderly, with important
implications for emergency and intensive care. We suggest further educational
measures to improve early sepsis recognition and prevention through vaccination.
Keywords: Elderly, Healthcare education, Knowledge, Sepsis
Weniger anzeigen
Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, David M Goldfarb, Konrad Reinhart, Luregn J Schlapbach, Niranjan Kissoon, Peter Schlattmann — The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
★★★★☆
2018
Abstract
The incidence of sepsis is highest in neonates and children, yet the global
burden of sepsis in these age groups has not been assessed. We reviewed
available evidence from observational epidemiological studies to estimate the
global burden and mortality of sepsis in neonates and children. We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies…
The incidence of sepsis is highest in neonates and children, yet the global
burden of sepsis in these age groups has not been assessed. We reviewed
available evidence from observational epidemiological studies to estimate the
global burden and mortality of sepsis in neonates and children. We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting population-based sepsis
incidence in neonates and children, published between 1979 and 2016. Our search
yielded 1270 studies, 23 of which met the inclusion criteria; 16 were from
high-income countries and seven from middle-income countries. 15 studies from 12
countries reported complete data and were included in the meta-analysis. We
found an aggregate estimate of 48 (95% CI 27-86) sepsis cases and 22 (14-33)
severe sepsis cases in children per 100 000 person-years. Mortality ranged from
1% to 5% for sepsis and 9% to 20% for severe sepsis. The population-level
estimate for neonatal sepsis was 2202 (95% CI 1099-4360) per 100 000 livebirths,
with mortality between 11% and 19%. Extrapolating these figures on a global
scale, we estimate an incidence of 3·0 million cases of sepsis in neonates and
1·2 million cases in children. Although these results confirm that sepsis is a
common and frequently fatal condition affecting neonates and children globally,
few population-based data are available from low-income settings and the lack of
standardisation of diagnostic criteria and definition of sepsis in the reviewed
studies are obstacles to the accurate estimation of global burden. Robust
epidemiological monitoring to define global sepsis incidence and mortality in
children is urgently needed.
Weniger anzeigen