Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Comparative study shows that 1 in 7 Spanish children with COVID-19 symptoms were still experiencing issues after 12 weeks
Ana I Hernaiz, Blanca Gonzalez-Haba, Cristina Calvo, Elena Sanchez-Marcos, Mª Luz García-García, María Bergia, María de Ceano-Vivas, Milagros García López-Hortelano, Raquel Jimenez-García — Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Aim: We investigated prolonged symptoms in children after COVID-19, including
the clinical characteristics and risk factors. Methods: This multicentre
retrospective study focused on 451 children under 18 years old who were
diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19 between 14 March and 31 December 2020.
Persistent symptoms were analysed with a telephone questionnaire by the
attending physicians from…
Aim: We investigated prolonged symptoms in children after COVID-19, including
the clinical characteristics and risk factors. Methods: This multicentre
retrospective study focused on 451 children under 18 years old who were
diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19 between 14 March and 31 December 2020.
Persistent symptoms were analysed with a telephone questionnaire by the
attending physicians from 1 August to 30 September 2021. A control group of 98
with no history of COVID-19, who were treated for other reasons, was also
included. Results: Most (82.0%) of the cases had mild infections that required
outpatient care and 5.1% were admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit
(PICU). We found that 18.4% had symptoms that lasted 4-12 weeks. There were also
14.6% who were symptomatic for longer than 12 weeks and the odds risks were
higher for children aged 5 years or more (OR 3.0), hospitalised (OR 3.9),
admitted to the PICU (OR 4.3) and with relatives who were symptomatic for 12
weeks or more (OR 2.8). The controls had similar percentages of prolonged
symptoms, despite having no history of COVID-19, especially those who were older
than 5 years. Conclusion: This study confirmed that a worrying percentage of
children had prolonged symptoms after COVID-19.
Weniger anzeigen
Bernadette Corica, Giulio Francesco Romiti, Marco Proietti, Stefania Basili — Journal of personalized medicine
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common complication in
patients with sepsis, although its prevalence and impact on outcomes are still
unclear. We aim to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the
prevalence of NOAF in patients with sepsis, and its impact on in-hospital
mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods:…
Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common complication in
patients with sepsis, although its prevalence and impact on outcomes are still
unclear. We aim to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the
prevalence of NOAF in patients with sepsis, and its impact on in-hospital
mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE
were systematically searched on 26 December 2021. Studies reporting on the
prevalence of NOAF and/or its impact on in-hospital mortality or ICU mortality
in patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The pooled prevalence and
95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, as well as the risk ratios (RR),
95%CI and 95% prediction intervals (PI) for outcomes. Subgroup analyses and
meta-regressions were performed to account for heterogeneity. Results: Among
4988 records retrieved from the literature search, 22 articles were included.
Across 207,847 patients with sepsis, NOAF was found in 13.5% (95%CI: 8.9-20.1%),
with high heterogeneity between studies; significant subgroup differences were
observed, according to the geographical location, study design and sample size
of the included studies. A multivariable meta-regression model showed that
sample size and geographical location account for most of the heterogeneity.
NOAF patients showed an increased risk of both in-hospital mortality (RR: 1.69,
95%CI: 1.47-1.96, 95%PI: 1.15-2.50) and ICU mortality (RR: 2.12, 95%CI:
1.86-2.43, 95%PI: 1.71-2.63), with moderate to no heterogeneity between the
included studies. Conclusions: NOAF is a common complication during sepsis,
being present in one out of seven individuals. Patients with NOAF are at a
higher risk of adverse events during sepsis, and may need specific therapeutical
interventions.
Weniger anzeigen
Can Wang, Rufu Xu, Xuelian Hu, Yu Zhao, Yuerong Zeng — PloS one
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Objective: To identify and compare prognostic accuracy of quick Sequential Organ
Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)
criteria, and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to predict mortality in
patients with suspected sepsis. Methods: This meta-analysis followed accordance
with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.…
Objective: To identify and compare prognostic accuracy of quick Sequential Organ
Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)
criteria, and National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to predict mortality in
patients with suspected sepsis. Methods: This meta-analysis followed accordance
with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of
Science, and the Cochrane Library databases from establishment of the database
to November 29, 2021. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs were
calculated using a bivariate random-effects model (BRM). Hierarchical summary
receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were generated to assess the
overall prognostic accuracy. Results: Data of 62338 patients from 26 studies
were included in this meta-analysis. qSOFA had the highest specificity and the
lowest sensitivity with a specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) and a
sensitivity of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.53). SIRS had the highest sensitivity and
the lowest specificity with a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) and a
specificity 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19-0.29). NEWS had both an intermediate sensitivity
and specificity with a sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63-0.81) and a specificity
0.52 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65). qSOFA showed higher overall prognostic accuracy than
SIRS and NEWS by comparing HSROC curves. Conclusions: Among qSOFA, SIRS and
NEWS, qSOFA showed higher overall prognostic accuracy than SIRS and NEWS.
However, no scoring system has both high sensitivity and specificity for
predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis.
Weniger anzeigen
Azizullah Beran, Hazem Ayesh, Khaled Srour, Mohammed Mhanna, Nameer Aladamat, Nehaya Altorok, Omar Srour, Saif-Eddin Malhas, Waleed Khokher, Ziad Abuhelwa — Journal of clinical medicine
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
The crystalloid fluid of choice in sepsis remains debatable. We aimed to perform
a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the effect of balanced crystalloids
(BC) vs. normal saline (NS) in adults with sepsis. A systematic search of
PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences databases through 22 January 2022, was
performed for studies that compared BC…
The crystalloid fluid of choice in sepsis remains debatable. We aimed to perform
a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the effect of balanced crystalloids
(BC) vs. normal saline (NS) in adults with sepsis. A systematic search of
PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences databases through 22 January 2022, was
performed for studies that compared BC vs. NS in adults with sepsis. Our
outcomes included mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal
replacement therapy (RRT), and ICU length of stay (LOS). Pooled risk ratio (RR)
and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs)
were obtained using a random-effect model. Fifteen studies involving 20,329
patients were included. Overall, BC showed a significant reduction in the
overall mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96), 28/30-day mortality (RR 0.87, 95%
CI 0.79-0.95), and AKI (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.93) but similar 90-day mortality
(RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.03), need for RRT (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.08), and ICU
LOS (MD -0.25 days, 95% CI -3.44, 2.95), were observed between the two groups.
However, subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed no
statistically significant differences in overall mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI
0.82-1.02), AKI (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47-1.06), and need for RRT (RR 0.71, 95% CI
0.36-1.41). Our meta-analysis demonstrates that overall BC was associated with
reduced mortality and AKI in sepsis compared to NS among patients with sepsis.
However, subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no significant differences in both
overall mortality and AKI between the groups. There was no significant
difference in the need for RRT or ICU LOS between BC and NS. Pending further
data, our study supports using BC over NS for fluid resuscitation in adults with
sepsis. Further large-scale RCTs are necessary to validate our findings.
Keywords: balanced crystalloids, lactated ringer, normal saline, plasmalyte,
sepsis
Weniger anzeigen
Adèle Hajjar, Basile Gilbert, Benoît Vivien, Emmanuel Bloch-Laine, Jean Pierre Tourtier, Josiane Boularan, Papa-Ngalgou Gueye, Patrick Ecollan, Romain Jouffroy, Vincent Bounes — BMC infectious diseases
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: Despite differences in time of sepsis recognition, recent studies
support that early initiation of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock
(SS) improves outcome without an increase in adverse effects. This study aims to
investigate the relationship between 30-day mortality in patients with SS and
prehospital norepinephrine infusion in order to reach a mean…
Background: Despite differences in time of sepsis recognition, recent studies
support that early initiation of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock
(SS) improves outcome without an increase in adverse effects. This study aims to
investigate the relationship between 30-day mortality in patients with SS and
prehospital norepinephrine infusion in order to reach a mean blood pressure
(MAP) > 65 mmHg at the end of the prehospital stage. Methods: From April 06th,
2016 to December 31th, 2020, patients with SS requiring prehospital Mobile
Intensive Care Unit intervention (MICU) were retrospectively analysed. To
consider cofounders, the propensity score method was used to assess the
relationship between prehospital norepinephrine administration in order to reach
a MAP > 65 mmHg at the end of the prehospital stage and 30-day mortality.
Results: Four hundred and seventy-eight patients were retrospectively analysed,
among which 309 patients (65%) were male. The mean age was 69 ± 15 years.
Pulmonary, digestive, and urinary infections were suspected among 44%, 24% and
17% patients, respectively. One third of patients (n = 143) received prehospital
norepinephrine administration with a median dose of 1.0 [0.5-2.0] mg h-1, among
which 84 (69%) were alive and 38 (31%) were deceased on day 30 after
hospital-admission. 30-day overall mortality was 30%. Cox regression analysis
after the propensity score showed a significant association between prehospital
norepinephrine administration and 30-day mortality, with an adjusted hazard
ratio of 0.42 [0.25-0.70], p < 10-3. Multivariate logistic regression of IPTW
retrieved a significant decrease of 30-day mortality among the prehospital
norepinephrine group: ORa = 0.75 [0.70-0.79], p 65 mmHg at the end of the prehospital stage is associated with a decrease
in 30-day mortality in patients with SS cared for by a MICU in the prehospital
setting. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm that very early
norepinephrine infusion decreases septic shock mortality.
Weniger anzeigen
Adam S Komorowski, Akhil Garg, Anthony D Bai, Carson Kl Lo, Isabella Stefanova, Julien Senecal, Kevin Guo, Mallika Suresh, Olivier Del Corpo, Pranav Tandon — Clinical microbiology and infection
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: Precise estimates of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
(SAB) are important to convey prognosis and guide design of interventional
studies. Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to
estimate the all-cause mortality in SAB and to explore how it changed with time.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews…
Background: Precise estimates of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
(SAB) are important to convey prognosis and guide design of interventional
studies. Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to
estimate the all-cause mortality in SAB and to explore how it changed with time.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from
January 1, 1991 to May 7, 2021. Study eligibility criteria: Human observational
studies on patients with S. aureus bloodstream infection. Participants: Patients
with a positive blood culture for S. aureus. Methods: Two independent reviewers
extracted study data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.
A generalized linear mixed random effects model was used to pool estimates.
Results: A total of 341 studies were included, which described 536,791 patients.
From 2011 onwards, the estimated mortality was 10.4% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 9.0%-12.1%) at 7 days, 13.3% (95% CI 11.1%-15.8%) at 2 weeks, 18.1% (95% CI
16.3%-20.0%) at 1 month, 27.0% (95% CI 21.5%-33.3%) at 3 months, and 30.2% (95%
CI 22.4%-39.3%) at 1 year. In a meta-regression model of 1-month mortality,
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) had a higher mortality (adjusted odds
ratio (aOR) 1.04 95% CI 1.02-1.06 per 10% increase in MRSA proportion), and
compared to prior to 2001, more recent time periods had lower mortality (aORs
0.88 [95% CI 0.75-1.03] for 2001 to 2010; 0.82 [95% CI 0.69-0.97] for 2011
onwards). Conclusions: SAB mortality has decreased over the last 3 decades.
However, more than 1 in 4 patients will die within 3 months and continuous
improvement in care remains necessary. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021253891.
Keywords: Bacteremia, Mortality, Staphylococcusaureus, meta-analysis
Weniger anzeigen
Effektivität von Qualitätsverbesserungsmaßnahmen, Epidemiologie und Krankheitskosten
Kommentar
Antiplatelet pretreatment and mortality in patients with severe sepsis: A secondary analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis in Japan
Daisuke Kudo, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Masakazu Kobayashi, Shigeki Kushimoto — Journal of critical care
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Purpose: Antiplatelet agents may attenuate inflammatory and coagulation
responses in patients with sepsis. This study aimed to examine the association
between pre-sepsis antiplatelet therapy and survival outcomes in patients with
sepsis. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of a Japanese
multicenter registry dataset. Participants aged >16 years who were admitted to
intensive care…
Purpose: Antiplatelet agents may attenuate inflammatory and coagulation
responses in patients with sepsis. This study aimed to examine the association
between pre-sepsis antiplatelet therapy and survival outcomes in patients with
sepsis. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of a Japanese
multicenter registry dataset. Participants aged >16 years who were admitted to
intensive care units for the treatment of severe sepsis (Sepsis 2 criteria) were
dichotomized, according to their pretreatment status with antiplatelet agents.
The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The data were analyzed using
inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with a propensity score for
pre-existing treatment using antiplatelet medication after multiple imputation.
Results: Data from a total of 1184 eligible patients (2016-2017) were analyzed.
A total of 175 patients were pretreated with antiplatelet medication. After
IPTW, the patients‘ characteristics were well balanced between the groups. The
in-hospital mortality rate among patients pretreated with antiplatelet
medication was significantly lower than that among patients pretreated without
antiplatelet medication (18.15% vs. 25.31%, difference: -7.86%, 95% confidence
interval [CI]: -14.3 to -1.4, p = 0.016). Conclusions: In this study,
pretreatment with antiplatelet medication before the onset of sepsis was
associated with decreased in-hospital mortality rates.
Weniger anzeigen
Michiel Schinkel, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, W Joost Wiersinga — Critical care (London, England)
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive
Care and Emergency Medicine 2022. Other selected articles can be found online at
https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2022 . Further information
about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available
from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive
Care and Emergency Medicine 2022. Other selected articles can be found online at
https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2022 . Further information
about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available
from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .
Persisting olfactory dysfunction in post-COVID-19 is associated with gustatory impairment: Results from chemosensitive testing eight months after the acute infection
Christopher Bohr, Constantin A Hintschich, Jürgen J Wenzel, René Fischer, Thomas Hummel, Veronika Vielsmeier — PloS one
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Olfactory and gustatory disorders are prominent symptoms of acute COVID-19.
Although both senses recover in many patients within weeks to months,
persistency has been described in up to 60%. However up to now most reports on
the course of chemosensitive disorders after COVID-19 are not based on
psychophysical testing but only on subjective patients’…
Olfactory and gustatory disorders are prominent symptoms of acute COVID-19.
Although both senses recover in many patients within weeks to months,
persistency has been described in up to 60%. However up to now most reports on
the course of chemosensitive disorders after COVID-19 are not based on
psychophysical testing but only on subjective patients‘ ratings. In this study
we assessed both olfaction and gustation using psychophysical tests eight months
after COVID-19. Validated psychophysical testing revealed hyposmia in 18% and
hypogeusia in even 32% of 303 included patients. This shows that olfactory and
especially gustatory disorders have to be seen as important chronic symptoms
post-COVID-19. The high prevalence of gustatory dysfunction indicates that
gustatory function does not recover or might even deteriorate in the months
following the acute infection.
Weniger anzeigen
Aline Munting, Benjamin Viala, David Haefliger, Eleftheria Kampouri, Eleftherios Karachalias, Eliana Tadini, Florian Desgranges, Jean Regina, Paraskevas Filippidis, Véronique Suttels — Journal of general internal medicine
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: After mild COVID-19, some outpatients experience persistent
symptoms. However, data are scarce and prospective studies are urgently needed.
Objectives: To characterize the post-COVID-19 syndrome after mild COVID-19 and
identify predictors. Participants: Outpatients with symptoms suggestive of
COVID-19 with (1) PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-positive) or (2) SARS-CoV-2
negative PCR (COVID-negative). Design: Monocentric cohort study with prospective
phone…
Background: After mild COVID-19, some outpatients experience persistent
symptoms. However, data are scarce and prospective studies are urgently needed.
Objectives: To characterize the post-COVID-19 syndrome after mild COVID-19 and
identify predictors. Participants: Outpatients with symptoms suggestive of
COVID-19 with (1) PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-positive) or (2) SARS-CoV-2
negative PCR (COVID-negative). Design: Monocentric cohort study with prospective
phone interview between more than 3 months to 10 months after initial visit to
the emergency department and outpatient clinics. Main measures: Data of the
initial visits were extracted from the electronic medical file. Predefined
persistent symptoms were assessed through a structured phone interview.
Associations between long-term symptoms and PCR results, as well as predictors
of persistent symptoms among COVID-positive, were evaluated by multivariate
logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, smoking, comorbidities, and timing
of the survey. Key results: The study population consisted of 418 COVID-positive
and 89 COVID-negative patients, mostly young adults (median age of 41 versus 36
years in COVID-positive and COVID-negative, respectively; p = 0.020) and
healthcare workers (67% versus 82%; p = 0.006). Median time between the initial
visit and the phone survey was 150 days in COVID-positive and 242 days in
COVID-negative patients. Persistent symptoms were reported by 223 (53%)
COVID-positive and 33 (37%) COVID-negative patients (p = 0.006) and proportions
were stable among the periods of the phone interviews. Overall, 21%
COVID-positive and 15% COVID-negative patients (p = 0.182) attended care for
this purpose. Four surveyed symptoms were independently associated with
COVID-19: fatigue (adjusted odds ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.04-4.41), smell/taste
disorder (26.5, 3.46-202), dyspnea (2.81, 1.10-7.16), and memory impairment
(5.71, 1.53-21.3). Among COVID-positive, female gender (1.67, 1.09-2.56) and
overweight/obesity (1.67, 1.10-2.56) were predictors of persistent symptoms.
Conclusions: More than half of COVID-positive outpatients report persistent
symptoms up to 10 months after a mild disease. Only 4 of 14 symptoms were
associated with COVID-19 status. The symptoms and predictors of the
post-COVID-19 syndrome need further characterization as this condition places a
significant burden on society.
Weniger anzeigen