Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Neurological outcomes one year after COVID-19 diagnosis: a prospective longitudinal cohort study
Alois Josef Schiefecker, Anna Lindner, Beatrice Heim, Bogdan Ianosi, Federico Carbone, Marina Peball, Mario Kofler, Philipp Mahlknecht, Ronny Beer, Verena Rass — European journal of neurology
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Introduction: Neurological sequelae from COVID-19 may persist after recovery
from acute infection. Here, we aimed to describe the natural history of
neurological manifestations over one year after COVID-19. Methods: We performed
a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal cohort study in COVID-19 survivors. At
3-month and 1-year follow-up, patients were assessed for neurological
impairments by a neurological examination…
Introduction: Neurological sequelae from COVID-19 may persist after recovery
from acute infection. Here, we aimed to describe the natural history of
neurological manifestations over one year after COVID-19. Methods: We performed
a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal cohort study in COVID-19 survivors. At
3-month and 1-year follow-up, patients were assessed for neurological
impairments by a neurological examination and a standardized test battery
including the assessment of hyposmia (16-item Sniffin-Sticks-test, SS-16),
cognitive deficits (Montreal Cognitive Assessment<26), and mental health
(Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Checklist-5). Results: Eighty-one patients were evaluated one year after
COVID-19, out of which 76/81 (94%) patients completed 3-month and 1-year
follow-up. Patients were 54 (47-64) years old and 59% were male. New and
persistent neurological disorders were found in 15% (3-months) and 12% (10/81;
1-year). Symptoms at 1-year follow-up were reported by 48/81 (59%) patients,
including fatigue (38%), concentration difficulties (25%), forgetfulness (25%),
sleep disturbances (22%), myalgia (17%), limb weakness (17%), headache (16%),
impaired sensation (16%), and hyposmia (15%). Neurological examination revealed
findings in 52/81 (64%) patients without improvement over time (3-months: 61%,
p=0.230) including hyposmia (SS-160.05). Conclusion: Our data indicate that a significant patient number still
suffer from neurological sequelae including neuropsychiatric symptoms one year
after COVID-19 calling for interdisciplinary management of these patients.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, long-COVID, neurologic manifestations
Weniger anzeigen
Anna-Jasmin Wetzel, Christian Förster, Miriam Giovanna Colombo, Peter Martus, Stefanie Joos — Deutsches Arzteblatt international
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: After recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a
considerable number of patients report long-term sequelae. The epidemiologic
data vary widely in the studies published to date, depending on the study design
and the patient cohorts analyzed. Using a population-based approach, we report
symptoms and clinical characteristics following COVID-19 (long COVID), focusing
on symptoms ≥12…
Background: After recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a
considerable number of patients report long-term sequelae. The epidemiologic
data vary widely in the studies published to date, depending on the study design
and the patient cohorts analyzed. Using a population-based approach, we report
symptoms and clinical characteristics following COVID-19 (long COVID), focusing
on symptoms ≥12 weeks (post-COVID-19). Methods: In three German administrative
districts, all adult patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by PCR
between March and September 2020 (n = 4632) were invited to complete a
questionnaire. Predictors for post-COVID-19 were identified by multiple ordinal
regression analysis. Study registration: DRKS00023069. Results: A total of 1459
patients were included in the study, 175 (12%) of whom had been hospitalized for
treatment of the acute phase of COVID-19. The prevalence of post-COVID-19 was
72.6% (n = 127) and 46.2% (n = 588) for hospitalized and non-hospitalized
patients, respectively. The most frequent long-term symptoms were fatigue (41.5%
of all symptoms ≥12 weeks, n = 297), physical exhaustion (40.8%, n = 292),
difficulty in concentrating (30.6%, n = 219), ageusia (25.9%, n = 185), and
anosmia (25.5%, n = 182). Quality of life was significantly impaired in patients
with post-COVID-19. The strongest risk factors for post-COVID-19 were female
sex, overall severity of comorbidities, and severity of acute COVID-19.
Conclusion: Patients who are not hospitalized also frequently experience
continued symptoms following COVID-19. The heterogeneity of symptoms calls for a
multidisciplinary stepped-care approach, for which identification of patients at
risk is crucial. A limitation of the study is the lack of a control group.
Weniger anzeigen
Alberto Fernández-Villar, Alejandro Araújo-Ameijeiras, Alexandre Pérez-González, Beatriz Gil de Araujo, Carlos Gómez, Cohort COVID-19 of the Galicia Sur Health Research Institute, Eva Poveda, Jorge Julio Cabrera, Manuel Crespo, Víctor Del Campo — Scientific reports
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Survivors to COVID-19 have described long-term symptoms after acute disease.
These signs constitute a heterogeneous group named long COVID or persistent
COVID. The aim of this study is to describe persisting symptoms 6 months after
COVID-19 diagnosis in a prospective cohort in the Northwest Spain. This is a
prospective cohort study performed in the…
Survivors to COVID-19 have described long-term symptoms after acute disease.
These signs constitute a heterogeneous group named long COVID or persistent
COVID. The aim of this study is to describe persisting symptoms 6 months after
COVID-19 diagnosis in a prospective cohort in the Northwest Spain. This is a
prospective cohort study performed in the COHVID-GS. This cohort includes
patients in clinical follow-up in a health area of 569,534 inhabitants after
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 diagnosis. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics were
collected during the follow up. A total of 248 patients completed 6 months
follow-up, 176 (69.4%) required hospitalization and 29 (10.2%) of them needed
critical care. At 6 months, 119 (48.0%) patients described one or more
persisting symptoms. The most prevalent were: extra-thoracic symptoms (39.1%),
chest symptoms (27%), dyspnoea (20.6%), and fatigue (16.1%). These symptoms were
more common in hospitalized patients (52.3% vs. 38.2%) and in women (59.0% vs.
40.5%). The multivariate analysis identified COPD, women gender and tobacco
consumption as risk factors for long COVID. Persisting symptoms are common after
COVID-19 especially in hospitalized patients compared to outpatients (52.3% vs.
38.2%). Based on these findings, special attention and clinical follow-up after
acute SARS-CoV-2 infection should be provided for hospitalized patients with
previous lung diseases, tobacco consumption, and women.
Weniger anzeigen
Binita Patel, Charles G Macias, Elliot Melendez, Fran Balamuth, Holly Depinet, Isabella Zaniletti, Joseph Luria, Roni D Lane, Sage R Myers, Troy Richardson — Pediatrics
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Objectives: The pediatric emergency department (ED)-based Pediatric Septic Shock
Collaborative (PSSC) aimed to improve mortality and key care processes among
children with presumed septic shock. Methods: This was a multicenter learning
and improvement collaborative of 19 pediatric EDs from November 2013 to May 2016
with shared screening and patient identification recommendations, bundles of
care, and…
Objectives: The pediatric emergency department (ED)-based Pediatric Septic Shock
Collaborative (PSSC) aimed to improve mortality and key care processes among
children with presumed septic shock. Methods: This was a multicenter learning
and improvement collaborative of 19 pediatric EDs from November 2013 to May 2016
with shared screening and patient identification recommendations, bundles of
care, and educational materials. Process metrics included minutes to initial
vital sign assessment and to first and third fluid bolus and antibiotic
administration. Outcomes included 3- and 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality,
hospital and ICU lengths of stay, hours on increased ventilation (including new
and increases from chronic baseline in invasive and noninvasive ventilation),
and hours on vasoactive agent support. Analysis used statistical process control
charts and included both the overall sample and an ICU subgroup. Results:
Process improvements were noted in timely vital sign assessment and receipt of
antibiotics in the overall group. Timely first bolus and antibiotics improved in
the ICU subgroup. There was a decrease in 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality
in the overall sample. Conclusions: A multicenter pediatric ED improvement
collaborative showed improvement in key processes for early sepsis management
and demonstrated that a bundled quality improvement-focused approach to sepsis
management can be effective in improving care.
Weniger anzeigen
Bernhard Poidinger, Christian Scheer, Claudia Tanja Matthaeus-Kraemer, Daniel O Thomas-Rüddel, Daniel Schwarzkopf, Friedhelm Bach, Hendrik Rüddel, Herwig Gerlach, Matthias Gründling, Matthias Lindner — Scientific reports
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Sepsis is a major reason for preventable hospital deaths. A cluster-randomized
controlled trial on an educational intervention did not show improvements of
sepsis management or outcome. We now aimed to test an improved implementation
strategy in a second intervention phase in which new intervention hospitals
(former controls) received a multifaceted educational intervention, while
controls (former…
Sepsis is a major reason for preventable hospital deaths. A cluster-randomized
controlled trial on an educational intervention did not show improvements of
sepsis management or outcome. We now aimed to test an improved implementation
strategy in a second intervention phase in which new intervention hospitals
(former controls) received a multifaceted educational intervention, while
controls (former intervention hospitals) only received feedback of quality
indicators. Changes in outcomes from the first to the second intervention phase
were compared between groups using hierarchical generalized linear models
controlling for possible confounders. During the two phases, 19 control
hospitals included 4050 patients with sepsis and 21 intervention hospitals
included 2526 patients. 28-day mortality did not show significant changes
between study phases in both groups. The proportion of patients receiving
antimicrobial therapy within one hour increased in intervention hospitals, but
not in control hospitals. Taking at least two sets of blood cultures increased
significantly in both groups. During phase 2, intervention hospitals showed
higher proportion of adequate initial antimicrobial therapy and de-escalation
within 5 days. A survey among involved clinicians indicated lacking resources
for quality improvement. Therefore, quality improvement programs should include
all elements of sepsis guidelines and provide hospitals with sufficient
resources for quality improvement.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov,
NCT01187134. Registered 23 August 2010,
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01187134 .
Weniger anzeigen
Attilio L Boner, Cecilia Iraci, Cristina De Rose, Danilo Buonsenso, Federico D'Ilario, Giuseppe Zampino, Leonardo Di Gennaro, Michele Piazza, Rosa Morello, Sarah O'Connell — Future microbiology
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
There is limited evidence available on the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2
infection in children. In this article, the authors analyze the recent evidence
on pediatric long covid and lessons learnt from a pediatric post-covid unit in
Rome, Italy. To gain a better understanding of the concerns raised by parents
and physicians in relation to…
There is limited evidence available on the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2
infection in children. In this article, the authors analyze the recent evidence
on pediatric long covid and lessons learnt from a pediatric post-covid unit in
Rome, Italy. To gain a better understanding of the concerns raised by parents
and physicians in relation to the potential long-term consequences of this novel
infection, it is important to recognize that long-term effect of a
post-infectious disease is not a new phenomenon.
Weniger anzeigen
Dafna Yahav, Dana Yelin, Francesco Pistelli, Idris Guessous, Ili Margalit, Irit Shapira-Lichter, Jaume Bordas-Martínez, Laura Carrozzi, Mayssam Nehme, Xavier Durà-Miralles — Journal of clinical medicine
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: Long COVID has become a burden on healthcare systems worldwide.
Research into the etiology and risk factors has been impeded by observing all
diverse manifestations as part of a single entity. We aimed to determine
patterns of symptoms in convalescing COVID-19 patients. Methods: Symptomatic
patients were recruited from four countries. Data were collected…
Background: Long COVID has become a burden on healthcare systems worldwide.
Research into the etiology and risk factors has been impeded by observing all
diverse manifestations as part of a single entity. We aimed to determine
patterns of symptoms in convalescing COVID-19 patients. Methods: Symptomatic
patients were recruited from four countries. Data were collected regarding
demographics, comorbidities, acute disease and persistent symptoms. Factor
analysis was performed to elucidate symptom patterns. Associations of the
patterns with patients‘ characteristics, features of acute disease and effect on
daily life were sought. Results: We included 1027 symptomatic post-COVID
individuals in the analysis. The majority of participants were graded as having
a non-severe acute COVID-19 (N = 763, 74.3%). We identified six patterns of
symptoms: cognitive, pain-syndrome, pulmonary, cardiac, anosmia-dysgeusia and
headache. The cognitive pattern was the major symptoms pattern, explaining 26.2%
of the variance; the other patterns each explained 6.5-9.5% of the variance. The
cognitive pattern was higher in patients who were outpatients during the acute
disease. The pain-syndrome pattern was associated with acute disease severity,
higher in women and increased with age. The pulmonary pattern was associated
with prior lung disease and severe acute disease. Only two of the patterns
(cognitive and cardiac) were associated with failure to return to pre-COVID
occupational and physical activity status. Conclusion: Long COVID diverse
symptoms can be grouped into six unique patterns. Using these patterns in future
research may improve our understanding of pathophysiology and risk factors of
persistent COVID, provide homogenous terminology for clinical research, and
direct therapeutic interventions.
Weniger anzeigen
Ida Henriette Caspersen, Lill Trogstad, Per Magnus — European journal of epidemiology
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Physical, psychological and cognitive symptoms have been reported as post-acute
sequelae for COVID-19 patients but are also common in the general uninfected
population. We aimed to calculate the excess risk and identify patterns of 22
symptoms up to 12 months after COVID-19. We followed more than 70,000 adult
participants in an ongoing cohort study,…
Physical, psychological and cognitive symptoms have been reported as post-acute
sequelae for COVID-19 patients but are also common in the general uninfected
population. We aimed to calculate the excess risk and identify patterns of 22
symptoms up to 12 months after COVID-19. We followed more than 70,000 adult
participants in an ongoing cohort study, the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child
Cohort Study (MoBa) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Infected and non-infected
participants registered presence of 22 different symptoms in March 2021. One
year after infection, 13 of 22 symptoms were associated with SARS-CoV-2
infection, based on relative risks between infected and uninfected subjects. For
instance, 17.4% of SARS-CoV-2 infected cohort participants reported fatigue that
persist 12 months after infection, compared to new occurrence of fatigue that
had lasted less than 12 months in 3.8% of non-infected subjects (excess risk
13.6%). The adjusted relative risk for fatigue was 4.8 (95% CI 3.5-6.7). Two
main underlying factors explained 50% of the variance in the 13 symptoms. Brain
fog, poor memory, dizziness, heart palpitations, and fatigue had high loadings
on the first factor, while shortness-of breath and cough had high loadings on
the second factor. Lack of taste and smell showed low to moderate correlation to
other symptoms. Anxiety, depression and mood swings were not strongly related to
COVID-19. Our results suggest that there are clusters of symptoms after COVID-19
due to different mechanisms and question whether it is meaningful to describe
long COVID as one syndrome.
Weniger anzeigen
COVID-19, Father and Child Cohort Study, MoBa, Post-acute sequelae,SARS-CoV-2, The Norwegian Mother
Kommentar
Spontaneously reported persistent symptoms related to coronavirus disease 2019 one year after hospital discharge : A retrospective cohort single-center study
Christian Braun, Daniel Grandt, David Zuschlag, Florian Custodis, Winfried Häuser — Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: There are no outcome studies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
survivors one year after hospital discharge in Germany. Methods: This
retrospective cohort study included all patients with polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
hospitalized in the departments of internal medicine of the Klinikum
Saarbrücken, a tertiary care hospital, between…
Background: There are no outcome studies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
survivors one year after hospital discharge in Germany. Methods: This
retrospective cohort study included all patients with polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
hospitalized in the departments of internal medicine of the Klinikum
Saarbrücken, a tertiary care hospital, between March 15 and December 31, 2020. A
telephone interview with survivors was conducted at least 12 months after
discharge. The interview was initiated with an open-ended question whether the
patient had fully recovered from the disease. In the event of a subjective
incomplete recovery, the patient was prompted to report any continuous or
frequent symptoms that had not occurred prior to COVID-19. Finally, independent
of the open-ended question response, all patients were asked closed questions
which addressed new symptom onset of persistent fatigue, cognitive dysfunction,
headache, muscle and joint pain following COVID-19. Results: In all, 235
survivors were contacted and 162 could be included in the analysis. In 55 of 162
interviews (34.0%) at least one persistent COVID-19 symptom (PCS) was
spontaneously reported. Four of 55 survivors with PCS reported five additional
symptoms on the closed questions. One survivor, who responded positively to the
open-ended question, reported new onset PCS in response to the closed questions.
Physical fatigue (24.7%), cognitive dysfunction (14.8%), shortness of breath
(8.6%), muscle and joint pain (6.8%) and headache (6.2%) were the most
frequently reported PCS. Conclusions: Despite an interview technique aimed to
reduce attribution bias by patients, one third of COVID-19 inpatient survivors
report PCS one year after hospitalization. The complete article is written in
English.
Weniger anzeigen
Betty Raman, David A Bluemke, Stefan Neubauer, Thomas F Lüscher — European heart journal
★★★☆☆
2022
Abstract
Emerging as a new epidemic, long COVID or post-acute sequelae of coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition characterized by the persistence of
COVID-19 symptoms beyond 3 months, is anticipated to substantially alter the
lives of millions of people globally. Cardiopulmonary symptoms including chest
pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, and autonomic manifestations such as
postural orthostatic…
Emerging as a new epidemic, long COVID or post-acute sequelae of coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition characterized by the persistence of
COVID-19 symptoms beyond 3 months, is anticipated to substantially alter the
lives of millions of people globally. Cardiopulmonary symptoms including chest
pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, and autonomic manifestations such as
postural orthostatic tachycardia are common and associated with significant
disability, heightened anxiety, and public awareness. A range of cardiovascular
(CV) abnormalities has been reported among patients beyond the acute phase and
include myocardial inflammation, myocardial infarction, right ventricular
dysfunction, and arrhythmias. Pathophysiological mechanisms for delayed
complications are still poorly understood, with a dissociation seen between
ongoing symptoms and objective measures of cardiopulmonary health. COVID-19 is
anticipated to alter the long-term trajectory of many chronic cardiac diseases
which are abundant in those at risk of severe disease. In this review, we
discuss the definition of long COVID and its epidemiology, with an emphasis on
cardiopulmonary symptoms. We further review the pathophysiological mechanisms
underlying acute and chronic CV injury, the range of post-acute CV sequelae, and
impact of COVID-19 on multiorgan health. We propose a possible model for
referral of post-COVID-19 patients to cardiac services and discuss future
directions including research priorities and clinical trials that are currently
underway to evaluate the efficacy of treatment strategies for long COVID and
associated CV sequelae.
Weniger anzeigen