Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Female Sex and Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Annette C Westgeest, Felicia Ruffin, Jackson L Kair, Joshua B Parsons, Maren E Webster, Merel M C Lambregts, Olaf M Dekkers, Rachel E Korn, Samantha Kaplan, Stacey A Maskarinec — JAMA network open
★★☆☆☆
2024
Abstract
Importance: Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of death due to bacterial
bloodstream infection. Female sex has been identified as a risk factor for
mortality in S aureus bacteremia (SAB) in some studies, but not in others.
Objective: To determine whether female sex is associated with increased
mortality risk in SAB. Data sources: MEDLINE,…
Importance: Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of death due to bacterial
bloodstream infection. Female sex has been identified as a risk factor for
mortality in S aureus bacteremia (SAB) in some studies, but not in others.
Objective: To determine whether female sex is associated with increased
mortality risk in SAB. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were
searched from inception to April 26, 2023. Study selection: Included studies met
the following criteria: (1) randomized or observational studies evaluating
adults with SAB, (2) included 200 or more patients, (3) reported mortality at or
before 90 days following SAB, and (4) reported mortality stratified by sex.
Studies on specific subpopulations (eg, dialysis, intensive care units, cancer
patients) and studies that included patients with bacteremia by various
microorganisms that did not report SAB-specific data were excluded. Data
extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed
by 1 reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias and quality were
assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Mortality data were
combined as odds ratios (ORs). Main outcome and measures: Mortality at or before
90-day following SAB, stratified by sex. Results: From 5339 studies retrieved,
89 were included (132 582 patients; 50 258 female [37.9%], 82 324 male [62.1%]).
Unadjusted mortality data were available from 81 studies (109 828 patients) and
showed increased mortality in female patients compared with male patients
(pooled OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18). Adjusted mortality data accounting for
additional patient characteristics and treatment variables were available from
32 studies (95 469 patients) and revealed a similarly increased mortality risk
in female relative to male patients (pooled adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI,
1.11-1.27). No evidence of publication bias was encountered. Conclusions and
relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, female patients with SAB
had higher mortality risk than males in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.
Further research is needed to study the potential underlying mechanisms.
Weniger anzeigen
Diana Mihaylov, Frank-Stephan Hohberger, Ignacio Rubio, Julia Kunze, Julia Leonhardt, Klaus Stahl, Michael Kiehntopf, Mirrin J Dorresteijn, Silke Leonhardt, Sophie Neugebauer — Critical care (London, England)
★★☆☆☆
2023
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced immunosuppression is a frequent cause of
opportunistic infections and death in critically ill patients. A better
understanding of the underlying mechanisms is needed to develop targeted
therapies. Circulating bile acids with immunosuppressive effects were recently
identified in critically ill patients. These bile acids activate the monocyte
G-protein coupled receptor TGR5, thereby inducing profound…
Background: Sepsis-induced immunosuppression is a frequent cause of
opportunistic infections and death in critically ill patients. A better
understanding of the underlying mechanisms is needed to develop targeted
therapies. Circulating bile acids with immunosuppressive effects were recently
identified in critically ill patients. These bile acids activate the monocyte
G-protein coupled receptor TGR5, thereby inducing profound innate immune
dysfunction. Whether these mechanisms contribute to immunosuppression and
disease severity in sepsis is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if
immunosuppressive bile acids are present in endotoxemia and septic shock and, if
so, which patients are particularly at risk. Methods: To induce experimental
endotoxemia in humans, ten healthy volunteers received 2 ng/kg E. coli
lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Circulating bile acids were profiled before and after
LPS administration. Furthermore, 48 patients with early (shock onset within 0.4 μg/kg/min) and 48 healthy
age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed for circulating bile acids. To
screen for immunosuppressive effects of circulating bile acids, the capability
to induce TGR5 activation was computed for each individual bile acid profile by
a recently published formula. Results: Although experimental endotoxemia as well
as septic shock led to significant increases in total bile acids compared to
controls, this increase was mild in most cases. By contrast, there was a marked
and significant increase in circulating bile acids in septic shock patients with
severe liver failure compared to healthy controls (61.8 µmol/L vs. 2.8 µmol/L, p
= 0.0016). Circulating bile acids in these patients were capable to induce
immunosuppression, as indicated by a significant increase in TGR5 activation by
circulating bile acids (20.4% in severe liver failure vs. 2.8% in healthy
controls, p = 0.0139). Conclusions: Circulating bile acids capable of inducing
immunosuppression are present in septic shock patients with severe liver
failure. Future studies should examine whether modulation of bile acid
metabolism can improve the clinical course and outcome of sepsis in these
patients.
Weniger anzeigen
Ayannah S Fitzgerald, Caroline A Ittner, Christopher H Gu, Frederic D Bushman, Jevon Graham-Wooten, Laurel J Glaser, Layla A Khatib, Nuala J Meyer, Scott Sherrill-Mix, YuChung Chuang — PloS one
★★☆☆☆
2023
Abstract
Background: The gut microbiome is believed to contribute to bloodstream
infection (BSI) via translocation of dominant gut bacteria in vulnerable patient
populations. However, conclusively linking gut and blood organisms requires
stringent approaches to establish strain-level identity. Methods: We enrolled a
convenience cohort of critically ill patients and investigated 86 bloodstream
infection episodes that occurred in…
Background: The gut microbiome is believed to contribute to bloodstream
infection (BSI) via translocation of dominant gut bacteria in vulnerable patient
populations. However, conclusively linking gut and blood organisms requires
stringent approaches to establish strain-level identity. Methods: We enrolled a
convenience cohort of critically ill patients and investigated 86 bloodstream
infection episodes that occurred in 57 patients. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
was used to define constituents of their gut microbiomes, and whole genome
sequencing and assembly was done on 23 unique bloodstream isolates that were
available from 21 patients. Whole genome sequences were downloaded from public
databases and used to establish sequence-identity distribution and define
thresholds for unrelated genomes of BSI species. Gut microbiome reads were then
aligned to whole genome sequences of the cognate bloodstream isolate and
unrelated database isolates to assess identity. Results: Gut microbiome
constituents matching the bloodstream infection species were present in half of
BSI episodes, and represented >30% relative abundance of gut sequences in 10% of
episodes. Among the 23 unique bloodstream organisms that were available for
whole genome sequencing, 14 were present in gut at the species level. Sequence
alignment applying defined thresholds for identity revealed that 6 met criteria
for identical strains in blood and gut, but 8 did not. Sequence identity between
BSI isolates and gut microbiome reads was more likely when the species was
present at higher relative abundance in gut. Conclusion: In assessing potential
gut source for BSI, stringent sequence-based approaches are essential to
determine if organisms responsible for BSI are identical to those in gut: of 14
evaluable patients in which the same species was present in both sites, they
were identical in 6/14, but were non-identical in 8/14 and thus inconsistent
with gut source. This report demonstrates application of sequencing as a key
tool to investigate infection tracking within patients.
Weniger anzeigen
Jannik Stokholm, Morten H Bestle, Signe Maria Linér, Stine Uhrenholt, Thomas Christensen — Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
★★☆☆☆
2023
Abstract
Background: Septic shock is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). The
pathophysiology is poorly understood but prolonged sympathetic activation
leading to autonomic dysfunction may be involved. Pupillary light response (PLR)
is a fast, inexpensive, noninvasive way to measure autonomic nervous system
function. The aim of the study was to observe dilation velocity of…
Background: Septic shock is common in the intensive care unit (ICU). The
pathophysiology is poorly understood but prolonged sympathetic activation
leading to autonomic dysfunction may be involved. Pupillary light response (PLR)
is a fast, inexpensive, noninvasive way to measure autonomic nervous system
function. The aim of the study was to observe dilation velocity of the PLR
(PLRdil.vel. ) in patients with and without septic shock and explore whether
other factors influenced the possible association. We hypothesized that the
presence of septic shock in intensive care patients is associated with changes
in sympathetic autonomic tone, which can be observed as changes in PLRdil.vel.
METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we included 91 adult
patients acutely admitted to a mixed ICU. The patients were followed for the
development of septic shock until ICU discharge. PLRdil.vel. was measured with a
portable pupillometer two times a day. We used linear mixed models to analyze
for an association between PLRdil.vel and septic shock along with several
covariables. Results: Ninety-one patients were enrolled and of these, 35 were in
septic shock. Septic shock was associated with a slowed PLRdil.vel of 0.3 mm/s
(95% confidence intervals [CI -0.4; -0.2]). Conclusions: Septic shock may be
associated with changes in sympathetic autonomic tone which is supported by the
findings from this study that septic shock was associated with a slower dilation
velocity in the pupillary light reflex. Further studies should examine if the
pupillary dilation velocity may serve as surrogate marker for changes in
sympathetic autonomic nervous system activity in intensive care patients in
septic shock. If so, future interventional studies should test if use of the
pupillary dilation velocity may be used for earlier detection of septic shock,
which could mean earlier institution of treatment measures for this condition.
Keywords: autonomic dysfunction, intensive care unit, pupillary light response,
septic shock
Weniger anzeigen
Are Patients With an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition Discharge Diagnosis Code for Sepsis Different in Regard to Demographics and Outcome Variables When Comparing Those With Sepsis Only to Those Also Diagnosed With COVID-19 or Those With a COVID-19 Diagnosis Alone?
David F Gaieski, Jumpei Tsukuda, Michael Li, Parker Maddox — Critical care explorations
★★☆☆☆
2023
Abstract
Objectives: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification
of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are
different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those
with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those with a COVID-19
diagnosis alone. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Nine hospitals…
Objectives: We analyzed whether patients with the International Classification
of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis code for sepsis are
different in regard to demographics and outcome variables when comparing those
with sepsis only to those also diagnosed with COVID-19 or those with a COVID-19
diagnosis alone. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Nine hospitals in
an academic health system. Patients: Patients with a final ICD-10 discharge
diagnostic code for sepsis only, a diagnosis of COVID-19-only, or a final sepsis
ICD-10 discharge code + a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to the hospital were
analyzed for demographic and outcome differences between the cohorts.
Interventions: None. Measurements and main results: A total of 11,395 patients
met inclusion criteria: 6,945 patients (60.9%) were ICD-10 sepsis code only,
3,294 patients (28.9%) were COVID-19 diagnosis-only, and 1,153 patients (10.1%)
were sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis. Comparing sepsis ICD-10 code +
COVID-19 diagnosis patients to sepsis ICD-10 code only and COVID-19
diagnosis-only patients, the sepsis ICD-10 code + COVID-19 diagnosis patients
were: older (69 [58-78] vs 67 [56-77] vs 64 [51-76] yr), less likely to be
female (40.3% vs 46.7% vs 49.5%), more frequently admitted to the ICU (59.3%
[684/1,153] vs 54.9% [1,810/3,297] vs 15% [1,042/6,945]), more frequently
required ventilatory support (39.3% [453/1,153] vs 31.8% [1,049/3,297] vs 6.0%
[417/6,945]), had longer median hospital length of stay (9 [5,16] vs 5 [3,8] vs
7. [4,13] d), and were more likely to die in the hospital (39.2% [452/1,153] vs
22.3% [735/3,297] vs 6.4% [444/6,945]). Conclusions: During the COVID-19
pandemic the sickest cohort of patients was those receiving an explicit ICD-10
code of sepsis + a COVID-19 diagnosis. A significant percentage of COVID-19
diagnosis-only patients appear to have been under-coded as they received a level
of critical care (ICU admission; intubation) suggestive of the presence of acute
organ dysfunction during their admission.
Weniger anzeigen
Aim: This study was designed to investigate how procalcitonin (PCT) levels are
affected by different pathogens in patients with sepsis. Materials & methods: A
total of 110 Gram-positive sepsis, 62 Gram-negative sepsis and 27 fungal sepsis
patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analysis was
performed to assess PCT levels. Results:…
Aim: This study was designed to investigate how procalcitonin (PCT) levels are
affected by different pathogens in patients with sepsis. Materials & methods: A
total of 110 Gram-positive sepsis, 62 Gram-negative sepsis and 27 fungal sepsis
patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier and ROC curve analysis was
performed to assess PCT levels. Results: PCT levels were 2.36 ng/ml in
Gram-negative patients, 0.79 ng/ml in Gram-positive patients and 0.89 ng/ml in
fungal patients. The area under the curve for PCT was 0.608, the cutoff value
was 1.34, sensitivity was 56.50% the specificity was 56.50%. Conclusion: PCT
survival levels of 7.71 ng/ml in Gram-negative patients, 2.65 ng/ml in
Gram-positive patients and 1.16 ng/ml in fungal patients can be evaluated to
predict survival.
Weniger anzeigen
Bacteremia, Intensive care unit, procalcitonin,sepsis
Kommentar
Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Patients with or without Cancer Admitted to the ICU for Septic Shock: A Retrospective Observational Study
Introduction: Cancer patients are at high risk of developing septic shock (SSh)
and are increasingly admitted to ICU given their improved long-term prognosis.
We, therefore, compared the prognosis of cancer and non-cancer patients with
SSh. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective cohort study (2013-2019)
on patients admitted to ICU for SSh. We compared the…
Introduction: Cancer patients are at high risk of developing septic shock (SSh)
and are increasingly admitted to ICU given their improved long-term prognosis.
We, therefore, compared the prognosis of cancer and non-cancer patients with
SSh. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective cohort study (2013-2019)
on patients admitted to ICU for SSh. We compared the clinical characteristics
and management and studied short- and long-term mortality with ICU and
in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival according to cancer status. Results:
We analyzed 239 ICU stays in 210 patients, 59.5% of whom were men (n = 125),
with a median age of 66.5 (IQR 56.3-77.0). Of the 121 cancer patients (57.6% of
all patients), 70 had solid tumors (33.3%), and 51 had hematological
malignancies (24.3%). When comparing ICU stays of patients with versus without
cancer (n = 148 vs. n = 91 stays, respectively), mortality reached 30.4% (n =
45) vs. 30.0% (n = 27) in the ICU (p = 0.95), and 41.6% (n = 59) vs. 35.6% (n =
32) in hospital (p = 0.36), respectively. ICU length of stay (LOS) was 5.0
(2.0-11.3) vs. 6.0 (3.0-15.0) days (p = 0.27), whereas in-hospital LOS was 25.5
(13.8-42.0) vs. 19.5 (10.8-41.0) days (p = 0.33). Upon multivariate analysis,
renal replacement therapy (OR = 2.29, CI95%: 1.06-4.93, p = 0.03), disseminated
intravascular coagulation (OR = 5.89, CI95%: 2.49-13.92, p < 0.01), and
mechanical ventilation (OR = 7.85, CI95%: 2.90-21.20, p < 0.01) were
associated with ICU mortality, whereas malignancy, hematological, or solid
tumors were not (OR = 1.41, CI95%: 0.65-3.04; p = 0.38). Similarly, overall
cancer status was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.99, CI95%:
0.98-4.03, p = 0.06); however, solid cancers were associated with increased
in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.52, CI95%: 1.12-5.67, p = 0.03). Lastly, mortality
was not significantly different at 365-day follow-up between patients with and
without cancer. Conclusions: In-hospital and ICU mortality, as well as LOS, were
not different in SSh patients with and without cancer, suggesting that
malignancies should no longer be considered a barrier to ICU admission.
Keywords: critical care, immunocompromised host, neoplasms, septic shock,
treatment outcome
Weniger anzeigen
Alexandros Rovas, Benjamin Florian Koch, Bernhard M W Schmidt, Carsten Hafer, Gabriele Eden, Jan T Kielstein, Julius J Schmidt, Philipp Kümpers, Stefan Büttner — Critical care (London, England)
★★☆☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background: Bacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the
outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial
load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective
therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100
Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that
is…
Background: Bacterial burden as well as duration of bacteremia influence the
outcome of patients with bloodstream infections. Promptly decreasing bacterial
load in the blood by using extracorporeal devices in addition to anti-infective
therapy has recently been explored. Preclinical studies with the Seraph® 100
Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph® 100), which consists of heparin that
is covalently bound to polymer beads, have demonstrated an effective binding of
bacteria and viruses. Pathogens adhere to the heparin coated polymer beads in
the adsorber as they would normally do to heparan sulfate on cell surfaces.
Using this biomimetic principle, the Seraph® 100 could help to decrease
bacterial burden in vivo. Methods: This first in human, prospective,
multicenter, non-randomized interventional study included patients with blood
culture positive bloodstream infection and the need for kidney replacement
therapy as an adjunctive treatment for bloodstream infections. We performed a
single four-hour hemoperfusion treatment with the Seraph® 100 in conjunction
with a dialysis procedure. Post procedure follow up was 14 days. Results:
Fifteen hemodialysis patients (3F/12 M, age 74.0 [68.0-78.5] years, dialysis
vintage 28.0 [11.0-45.0] months) were enrolled. Seraph® 100 treatment started
66.4 [45.7-80.6] hours after the initial positive blood culture was drawn.
During the treatment with the Seraph® 100 with a median blood flow of 285
[225-300] ml/min no device or treatment related adverse events were reported.
Blood pressure and heart rate remained stable while peripheral oxygen saturation
improved during the treatment from 98.0 [92.5-98.0] to 99.0 [98.0-99.5] %; p =
0.0184. Four patients still had positive blood culture at the start of Seraph®
100 treatment. In one patient blood cultures turned negative during treatment.
The time to positivity (TTP) was increased between inflow and outflow blood
cultures by 36 [- 7.2 to 96.3] minutes. However, overall TTP increase was not
statistical significant. Conclusions: Seraph® 100 treatment was well tolerated.
Adding Seraph® 100 to antibiotics early in the course of bacteremia might result
in a faster resolution of bloodstream infections, which has to be evaluated in
further studies. Trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02914132
, first posted September 26, 2016.
Weniger anzeigen
The Long-Term Effect of COVID-19 Disease Severity on Risk of Diabetes Incidence and the Near 1-Year Follow-Up Outcomes among Postdischarge Patients in Wuhan
Boli Zhang, Fengwen Yang, Jun Zhang, Rui Zhu, Tingting Shu, Xuefeng Lai — Journal of clinical medicine
★★☆☆☆
2022
Abstract
We assessed the nearly 1-year health consequences following discharge and
related risk factors of COVID-19 infection and further explored the long-term
effect of COVID-19 disease severity on the risk of diabetes incidence. This
prospective study included 248 COVID-19 patients discharged from Wuhan Hospital
of Traditional Chinese Medicine who were followed up between 1 March…
We assessed the nearly 1-year health consequences following discharge and
related risk factors of COVID-19 infection and further explored the long-term
effect of COVID-19 disease severity on the risk of diabetes incidence. This
prospective study included 248 COVID-19 patients discharged from Wuhan Hospital
of Traditional Chinese Medicine who were followed up between 1 March and 10 June
2021. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate risk factors. The top ten
symptoms were shortness of breath (30.3%), sore or dry throat (25.7%), cough
(23.2%), expectoration (23.2%), body pain (22.3%), chest tightness (20.8%),
palpitations (17.8%), sleep difficulties (17.0%), fatigue (16.6%), and anxiety
(15.3%). Hypertension was associated with fatigue (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.08,
5.80), shortness of breath (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.16, 4.69), palpitations (OR =
2.82, 95% CI: 1.26, 6.31), expectoration (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.30), and
sore or dry throat (OR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.30, 5.65). Diabetes was associated with
palpitations (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.18, 8.81). Critical illness was associated
with an increased risk of diabetes incidence after discharge (OR = 2.90, 95% CI:
1.07, 7.88), which seemed more evident in males. Long COVID-19 symptoms were
common at 1-year postdischarge; hypertension and diabetes could be projected as
potential risk factors. We are among the first researchers to find that critical
illness is associated with incident diabetes after discharge. Keywords:
COVID-19, follow-up, incident diabetes, long-term effects, sequelae
Weniger anzeigen