Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Cognitive, EEG, and MRI features of COVID-19 survivors: a 10-month study
Alessandra Barbieri, Camilla Cividini, Elisa Canu, Federica Agosta, Giordano Cecchetti, Marco Cursi, Maria Paola Bernasconi, Rosalinda Cardamone, Silvia Basaia, Veronica Castelnovo — Journal of neurology
★☆☆☆☆
2022
Abstract
Background and objectives: To explore cognitive, EEG, and MRI features in
COVID-19 survivors up to 10 months after hospital discharge. Methods: Adult
patients with a recent diagnosis of COVID-19 and reporting subsequent cognitive
complaints underwent neuropsychological assessment and 19-channel-EEG within 2
months (baseline, N = 49) and 10 months (follow-up, N = 33) after…
Background and objectives: To explore cognitive, EEG, and MRI features in
COVID-19 survivors up to 10 months after hospital discharge. Methods: Adult
patients with a recent diagnosis of COVID-19 and reporting subsequent cognitive
complaints underwent neuropsychological assessment and 19-channel-EEG within 2
months (baseline, N = 49) and 10 months (follow-up, N = 33) after hospital
discharge. A brain MRI was obtained for 36 patients at baseline. Matched healthy
controls were included. Using eLORETA, EEG regional current densities and linear
lagged connectivity values were estimated. Total brain and white matter
hyperintensities (WMH) volumes were measured. Clinical and instrumental data
were evaluated between patients and controls at baseline, and within patient
whole group and with/without dysgeusia/hyposmia subgroups over time.
Correlations among findings at each timepoint were computed. Results: At
baseline, 53% and 28% of patients showed cognitive and psychopathological
disturbances, respectively, with executive dysfunctions correlating with
acute-phase respiratory distress. Compared to healthy controls, patients also
showed higher regional current density and connectivity at delta band,
correlating with executive performances, and greater WMH load, correlating with
verbal memory deficits. A reduction of cognitive impairment and delta band EEG
connectivity were observed over time, while psychopathological symptoms
persisted. Patients with acute dysgeusia/hyposmia showed lower improvement at
memory tests than those without. Lower EEG delta band at baseline predicted
worse cognitive functioning at follow-up. Discussion: COVID-19 patients showed
interrelated cognitive, EEG, and MRI abnormalities 2 months after hospital
discharge. Cognitive and EEG findings improved at 10 months. Dysgeusia and
hyposmia during acute COVID-19 were related with increased vulnerability in
memory functions over time.
Weniger anzeigen
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — OECD Indicators
★☆☆☆☆
2021
Abstract
Nurses are defined as all the „practising“ nurses providing direct health
services to patients, including self-employed nurses. However, for some
countries (France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Turkey
and the United States), due to lack of comparable data, the figures correspond
to „professionally active“ nurses, including nurses working in the health sector
as managers,…
Nurses are defined as all the „practising“ nurses providing direct health
services to patients, including self-employed nurses. However, for some
countries (France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Turkey
and the United States), due to lack of comparable data, the figures correspond
to „professionally active“ nurses, including nurses working in the health sector
as managers, educators, researchers, etc. For Austria and Greece, the data
include only nurses working in hospitals. Midwives and nursing aides (who are
not recognised as nurses) are normally excluded although some countries include
midwives as they are considered specialist nurses. This indicator is measured
per 1 000 inhabitants.
Weniger anzeigen
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — OECD Indicators
★☆☆☆☆
2021
Abstract
This indicator provides a measure of the resources available for delivering
services to inpatients in hospitals in terms of number of beds that are
maintained, staffed and immediately available for use. Total hospital beds
include curative (or acute) care beds, rehabilitative care beds, long-term care
beds and other beds in hospitals. The indicator is…
This indicator provides a measure of the resources available for delivering
services to inpatients in hospitals in terms of number of beds that are
maintained, staffed and immediately available for use. Total hospital beds
include curative (or acute) care beds, rehabilitative care beds, long-term care
beds and other beds in hospitals. The indicator is presented as a total and for
curative care and psychiatric care. It is measured in number of beds per 1 000
inhabitants.
Weniger anzeigen
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — OECD Indicators
★☆☆☆☆
2021
Abstract
This indicator presents data on the number of consultations patients have with
doctors in a given year. Consultations with doctors can take place in doctors’
offices or clinics, in hospital outpatient departments or, in some cases, in
patients’ own homes. Consultations with doctors refer to the number of contacts
with physicians, both generalists and…
This indicator presents data on the number of consultations patients have with
doctors in a given year. Consultations with doctors can take place in doctors’
offices or clinics, in hospital outpatient departments or, in some cases, in
patients’ own homes. Consultations with doctors refer to the number of contacts
with physicians, both generalists and specialists. There are variations across
countries in the coverage of different types of consultations, notably in
outpatient departments of hospitals. The data come from administrative sources
or surveys, depending on the country. This indicator is measured per capita.
Weniger anzeigen
HSE Clinical Design and Innovation, National Sepsis Lead — Report 2019
★☆☆☆☆
2020
Abstract
This is the fifth National Sepsis Outcome Report describing the burden of sepsis
on the Irish healthcare system, in terms of the number of cases and the
associated mortality. Understanding the pattern of sepsis incidence in Ireland
is essential to inform us on the characteristics of individuals who are at
increased risk both of…
This is the fifth National Sepsis Outcome Report describing the burden of sepsis
on the Irish healthcare system, in terms of the number of cases and the
associated mortality. Understanding the pattern of sepsis incidence in Ireland
is essential to inform us on the characteristics of individuals who are at
increased risk both of developing sepsis and of dying from sepsis. This allows
us to have heightened vigilance for sepsis amongst these individuals and
provides evidence to support the use of preventative strategies, such as
vaccination, in these at-risk people. While sepsis occurs in all age groups and
all sectors of society, it most commonly occurs in the extremes of age and in
individuals with co-morbidities. The most effective way to reduce mortality from
sepsis is by prevention, with good sanitation, personal hygiene, healthy eating,
exercising moderately, breast feeding, avoiding unnecessary antibiotics and
vaccination for vaccine preventable infections.
Weniger anzeigen
Despite huge strides in improving awareness and delivery of care since the 2012
World Sepsis Declaration, sepsis remains one of the most common and
least-recognized illnesses in both the developed and developing world. Sepsis
arises when the body’s response to an infection injures its own tissues and
organs. It may lead to shock, multiple…
Despite huge strides in improving awareness and delivery of care since the 2012
World Sepsis Declaration, sepsis remains one of the most common and
least-recognized illnesses in both the developed and developing world. Sepsis
arises when the body’s response to an infection injures its own tissues and
organs. It may lead to shock, multiple organ failure, disability and death,
especially if not recognized early and treated promptly. The Global Burden of
Disease Sepsis Report published in January 2020 estimated that 49 million
patients suffer sepsis every year, with 11 million of those dying. This burden
is significantly higher than the number of lives lost to cancer or coronary
disease. Sepsis can affect anyone as a consequence of infection, but globally
young children suffer most. Eighty-five percent of people affected reside in
low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, whilst the incidence of
sepsis in LMICs is similar to that in high-income countries (HICs), reduced
access to infection prevention strategies and resilient healthcare systems in
LMICs results in significantly poorer outcomes. Young people in LMICs are
disproportionately affected with resultant socioeconomic impact – half of the
burden of sepsis in resource-poor countries (25 million cases per year), and
many lives lost, occur in children under 5 years of age. Moreover, the last
decade has seen a worrying increase in the number of episodes reported in women
during or immediately following pregnancy. Worldwide, a person dies from sepsis
every 2.8 seconds. If we are to deliver on the UN Sustainable Development Goal
(SDG) 3 for Good Health and Well-Being (most particularly those targets around
reduction of maternal, child, and neonatal mortality and non-communicable
disease burden as well as the target to achieve universal, accessible health
coverage), it is now imperative that we address the burden of sepsis in both
HICs and LMICs. Despite its remarkable incidence, sepsis is practically unknown
to the public.
Weniger anzeigen
Sepsis is a preventable, life-threatening condition marked by severe organ
dysfunction. For 2017, it was estimated that it had affected 49 million
individuals and was related to approximately 11 million potentially avoidable
deaths worldwide. Sepsis mortality is often related to suboptimal quality of
care, an inadequate health infrastructure, poor infection prevention measures in
place, late…
Sepsis is a preventable, life-threatening condition marked by severe organ
dysfunction. For 2017, it was estimated that it had affected 49 million
individuals and was related to approximately 11 million potentially avoidable
deaths worldwide. Sepsis mortality is often related to suboptimal quality of
care, an inadequate health infrastructure, poor infection prevention measures in
place, late diagnosis, and inappropriate clinical management. Antimicrobial
resistance further complicates sepsis management across all settings,
particularly in high-risk populations, such as neonates and patients in
intensive care units (ICUs). While primary infections have remained the leading
cause of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality over the last three decades, there
has been a marked increase in the proportion of sepsis incidence and mortality
linked to injuries and non-communicable diseases. Moreover, survivors of sepsis
face serious long-term health consequences in the form of increased
post-discharge mortality, physical and cognitive impairment, and mental health
disorders. Unfortunately, high-quality epidemiological data on the burden of
sepsis are limited by inconsistent and variable diagnostic criteria, few
prospective studies, and suboptimal administrative data and hospital discharge
coding.
Weniger anzeigen
Europäische Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — Gesundheitsbericht der Europäischen Union
★☆☆☆☆
2020
Abstract
The Health at a Glance: Europe report series gauges progress towards effective,
accessible and resilient health systems across the EU. The report – which is
published every two years – provides a neutral, descriptive comparison of all EU
countries based on publically available data and indicators. The most recent
Health at a Glance: Europe…
The Health at a Glance: Europe report series gauges progress towards effective,
accessible and resilient health systems across the EU. The report – which is
published every two years – provides a neutral, descriptive comparison of all EU
countries based on publically available data and indicators. The most recent
Health at a Glance: Europe report was published in November 2020. Developed by
the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in cooperation
with the Commission, this publication provides analysis of the state of health
of EU citizens and the performance of EU health systems. In addition to chapters
on health status, risk factors for health, health expenditure, quality and
access to care in 36 European countries, the 2020 report includes 2 thematic
chapters of high relevance for the EU’s agenda. The first chapter provides an
in-depth analysis and assessment of European health systems’ resilience to the
COVID-19 health crisis. The second chapter presents an assessment of the impact
of air pollution on health in Europe.
Weniger anzeigen
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Health at a glance — OECD Indicators
★☆☆☆☆
2019
Abstract
Health at a Glance compares key indicators for population health and health
system performance across OECD members, candidate and partner countries. It
highlights how countries differ in terms of the health status and health-seeking
behaviour of their citizens; access to and quality of health care; and the
resources available for health. Analysis is based…
Health at a Glance compares key indicators for population health and health
system performance across OECD members, candidate and partner countries. It
highlights how countries differ in terms of the health status and health-seeking
behaviour of their citizens; access to and quality of health care; and the
resources available for health. Analysis is based on the latest comparable data
across 80 indicators, with data coming from official national statistics, unless
otherwise stated. Alongside indicator-by-indicator analysis, an overview chapter
summarises the comparative performance of countries and major trends, including
how much health spending is associated with staffing, access, quality and health
outcomes. This edition also includes a special focus on patient-reported
outcomes and experiences, with a thematic chapter on measuring what matters for
people-centred health systems.
Weniger anzeigen