Sepsis Infozentrale – Aktuelles Wissen rund um Sepsis
Unsere Sepsis Infozentrale bietet fundierte und unabhängige Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis und auf die Versorgungsforschung rund um das Thema: Wie häufig ist Sepsis? Wie wird sie versorgt? Wie sind die Ergebnisse? Was erleben Patientinnen und Patienten?.
Ein zentrales Element ist unsere Literaturdatenbank, die eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse aus renommierten Quellen bereitstellt. Durch regelmäßige, systematische Recherchen in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine wird sie wöchentlich aktualisiert und erweitert – für stets aktuelle, evidenzbasierte Informationen.
Bleiben Sie informiert und vertiefen Sie Ihr Wissen rund um Sepsis!
Unsere Wissens- und Literatur-Datenbank richtet sich an Ärztinnen und Ärzte, die in die Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge der Sepsis eingebunden sind, an medizinische Fachkräfte, Patientinnen und Patienten sowie Selbsthilfegruppen. Sie dient auch zur Information anderer Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens und der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit.
Informationen zur Literaturdatenbank
Die Datenbank bietet eine qualifizierte Auswahl aktueller, unabhängiger Informationen zur Prävention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge von Sepsis. Auf Grund der äußerst engen pathophysiologischen Verknüpfungen der COVID-19-Erkrankung und der Sepsis werden auch diesbezügliche Publikationen unabhängig von einem septischen Verlauf der SARS-CoV-2-Infektion eingeschlossen. Die vorliegende Liste berücksichtigt Publikationen, die aus Literaturverzeichnissen von Leitlinien, internationalen Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, sowie aus systematischen Reviews ausgewählt wurden, ergänzt durch Expertenempfehlungen. Die Datenbank wird wöchentlich durch systematische Literatursuche in der Medline-Datenbank der National Library of Medicine aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse vom Redaktionsteam hinsichtlich der Relevanz bewertet. Die gelisteten Publikationen werden nach wissenschaftlicher Qualität und Evidenz ausgewählt, jedoch ohne systematische Quantifizierung der Evidenz. Die Datenbank erhebt nicht den Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Sepsis-Stiftung überprüft die Auswahl jährlich. Ein Klick auf den im Pfeil integrierten DOI-Link öffnet das jeweilige Abstract oder den Volltext der entsprechenden Publikation in einem neuen Tab.
Acetaminophen for Prevention and Treatment of Organ Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial
Alpha Fowler, Andrea S Foulkes, D Clark Files, Ivor S Douglas, Lorraine B Ware, Michael S Aboodi, Neil R Aggarwal, Roy G Brower, Scott Fields, Steven Y Chang — JAMA
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Importance: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) has many pharmacological effects that
might be beneficial in sepsis, including inhibition of cell-free
hemoglobin-induced oxidation of lipids and other substrates. Objective: To
determine whether acetaminophen increases days alive and free of organ
dysfunction in sepsis compared with placebo. Design, setting, and participants:
Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, clinical trial conducted from October…
Importance: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) has many pharmacological effects that
might be beneficial in sepsis, including inhibition of cell-free
hemoglobin-induced oxidation of lipids and other substrates. Objective: To
determine whether acetaminophen increases days alive and free of organ
dysfunction in sepsis compared with placebo. Design, setting, and participants:
Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, clinical trial conducted from October 2021 to
April 2023 with 90-day follow-up. Adults with sepsis and respiratory or
circulatory organ dysfunction were enrolled in the emergency department or
intensive care unit of 40 US academic hospitals within 36 hours of presentation.
Intervention: Patients were randomized to 1 g of acetaminophen intravenously
every 6 hours or placebo for 5 days. Main outcome and measures: The primary end
point was days alive and free of organ support (mechanical ventilation,
vasopressors, and kidney replacement therapy) to day 28. Treatment effect
modification was evaluated for acetaminophen by prerandomization plasma
cell-free hemoglobin level higher than 10 mg/dL. Results: Of 447 patients
enrolled (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years, 51% female, mean Sequential Organ Failure
Assessment [SOFA] score, 5.4 [SD, 2.5]), 227 were randomized to acetaminophen
and 220 to placebo. Acetaminophen was safe with no difference in liver enzymes,
hypotension, or fluid balance between treatment arms. Days alive and free of
organ support to day 28 were not meaningfully different for acetaminophen (20.2
days; 95% CI, 18.8 to 21.6) vs placebo (19.6 days; 95% CI, 18.2 to 21.0; P =
.56; difference, 0.6; 95% CI, -1.4 to 2.6). Among 15 secondary outcomes, total,
respiratory, and coagulation SOFA scores were significantly lower on days 2
through 4 in the acetaminophen arm as was the rate of development of acute
respiratory distress syndrome within 7 days (2.2% vs 8.5% acetaminophen vs
placebo; P = .01; difference, -6.3; 95% CI, -10.8 to -1.8). There was no
significant interaction between cell-free hemoglobin levels and acetaminophen.
Conclusions and relevance: Intravenous acetaminophen was safe but did not
significantly improve days alive and free of organ support in critically ill
sepsis patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04291508.
Weniger anzeigen
Allan J Walkey, Anica C Law, Archana Tale, Karen E Lasser, Nicholas A Bosch, Yang Song — JAMA network open
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Importance: In-hospital mortality of patients with sepsis is frequently measured
for benchmarking, both by researchers and policymakers. Prior studies have
reported higher in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis at safety-net
hospitals compared with non-safety-net hospitals; however, in critically ill
patients, in-hospital mortality rates are known to be associated with hospital
discharge practices, which may differ…
Importance: In-hospital mortality of patients with sepsis is frequently measured
for benchmarking, both by researchers and policymakers. Prior studies have
reported higher in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis at safety-net
hospitals compared with non-safety-net hospitals; however, in critically ill
patients, in-hospital mortality rates are known to be associated with hospital
discharge practices, which may differ between safety-net hospitals and
non-safety-net hospitals. Objective: To assess how admission to safety-net
hospitals is associated with 2 metrics of short-term mortality (in-hospital
mortality and 30-day mortality) and discharge practices among patients with
sepsis. Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective, national cohort study
of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years and older, admitted with
sepsis to an intensive care unit from January 2011 to December 2019 based on
information from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review File. Data were
analyzed from October 2022 to September 2023. Exposure: Admission to a
safety-net hospital (hospitals with a Medicare disproportionate share index in
the top quartile per US region). Main outcomes and measures: Coprimary outcomes:
in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes: (1) in-hospital
do-not-resuscitate orders, (2) in-hospital palliative care delivery, (3)
discharge to a postacute facility (skilled nursing facility, inpatient
rehabilitation facility, or long-term acute care hospital), and (4) discharge to
hospice. Results: Between 2011 and 2019, 2 551 743 patients with sepsis (mean
[SD] age, 78.8 [8.2] years; 1 324 109 [51.9%] female; 262 496 [10.3%] Black, 2
137 493 [83.8%] White, and 151 754 [5.9%] other) were admitted to 666 safety-net
hospitals and 1924 non-safety-net hospitals. Admission to safety-net hospitals
was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI,
1.06-1.13) but not 30-day mortality (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04). Admission to
safety-net hospitals was associated with lower do-not-resuscitate rates (OR,
0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91), palliative care delivery rates (OR, 0.66; 95% CI,
0.60-0.73), and hospice discharge (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87) but not with
discharge to postacute facilities (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01). Conclusions and
relevance: In this cohort study, among patients with sepsis, admission to
safety-net hospitals was associated with higher in-hospital mortality but not
with 30-day mortality. Differences in in-hospital mortality may partially be
explained by greater use of hospice at non-safety-net hospitals, which shifts
attribution of death from the index hospitalization to hospice. Future
investigations and publicly reported quality measures should consider
time-delimited rather than hospital-delimited measures of short-term mortality
to avoid undue penalty to safety-net hospitals with similar short-term
mortality.
Weniger anzeigen
Changjie Cai, Huan Ma, Ka Yin Lui, Ruoxu Dou, Shuhe Li, Xiangdong Guan, Xiaodong Song, Xiayan Qian, Yujun Liang — American journal of surgery
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Background: Despite the fact that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is commonly
applied in surgical intensive care unit (ICU), the effect of RBC transfusion on
long-term outcomes remains undetermined. We aimed to explore the association
between RBC transfusion and the long-term prognosis of surgical sepsis
survivors. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on adult…
Background: Despite the fact that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is commonly
applied in surgical intensive care unit (ICU), the effect of RBC transfusion on
long-term outcomes remains undetermined. We aimed to explore the association
between RBC transfusion and the long-term prognosis of surgical sepsis
survivors. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on adult sepsis
patients admitted to a tertiary surgical ICU center in China. Patients were
divided into transfusion and non-transfusion groups based on the presence of RBC
transfusion. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of
treatment weighting (IPTW)were performed to balance the potential confounders.
Results: A total of 1421 surgical sepsis survivors were enrolled, including 403
transfused patients and 1018 non-transfused patients. There was a significant
difference in 1-year mortality between the two groups (23.1 % vs 12.7 %, HR:
1.539, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.030-2.299, P < 0.001). After PSM and
IPTW, transfused patients still showed significantly increased 1-year mortality
risks compared to non-transfused individuals (PSM: 23.6 % vs 15.9 %, HR 1.606,
95 % CI 1.036-2.488 P = 0.034; IPTW: 20.1 % vs 12.9 %, HR 1.600, 95 % CI
1.040-2.462 P = 0.032). Among patients with nadir hemoglobin below 70 g/L,
1-year mortality risks in both groups were similar (HR 1.461, 95 % CI
0.909-2.348, P = 0.118). However, among patients with nadir hemoglobin above 70
g/L, RBC transfusion was correlated with increased 1-year mortality risk (HR
1.556, 95 % CI 1.020-2.374, P = 0.040). Conclusion: For surgical sepsis
survivors, RBC transfusion during ICU stay was associated with increased 1-year
mortality, especially when patients show hemoglobin levels above 70 g/L.
Keywords: Red blood cell transfusion, Sepsis survivor, Surgical intensive care
unit, Surgical sepsis
Weniger anzeigen
Anthony Devaux, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Hatem Elkady, Jan J De Waele, Joel M Dulhunty, Lars Eriksson, Menino O Cotta, Mohd H Abdul-Aziz, Naomi E Hammond, Stephen J Brett — JAMA
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Importance: There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of β-lactam
antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with
sepsis or septic shock. Objective: To determine whether prolonged β-lactam
antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically
ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions.
Data sources:…
Importance: There is uncertainty about whether prolonged infusions of β-lactam
antibiotics improve clinically important outcomes in critically ill adults with
sepsis or septic shock. Objective: To determine whether prolonged β-lactam
antibiotic infusions are associated with a reduced risk of death in critically
ill adults with sepsis or septic shock compared with intermittent infusions.
Data sources: The primary search was conducted with MEDLINE (via PubMed),
CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and
ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2, 2024. Study selection: Randomized
clinical trials comparing prolonged (continuous or extended) and intermittent
infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis or septic
shock. Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and risk of bias were
assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with
the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
A bayesian framework was used as the primary analysis approach and a frequentist
framework as the secondary approach. Main outcomes and measures: The primary
outcome was all-cause 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive
care unit (ICU) mortality and clinical cure. Results: From 18 eligible
randomized clinical trials that included 9108 critically ill adults with sepsis
or septic shock (median age, 54 years; IQR, 48-57; 5961 men [65%]), 17 trials
(9014 participants) contributed data to the primary outcome. The pooled
estimated risk ratio for all-cause 90-day mortality for prolonged infusions of
β-lactam antibiotics compared with intermittent infusions was 0.86 (95% credible
interval, 0.72-0.98; I2 = 21.5%; high certainty), with a 99.1% posterior
probability that prolonged infusions were associated with lower 90-day
mortality. Prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics was associated with a
reduced risk of intensive care unit mortality (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% credible
interval, 0.70-0.97; high certainty) and an increase in clinical cure (risk
ratio, 1.16; 95% credible interval, 1.07-1.31; moderate certainty). Conclusions
and relevance: Among adults in the intensive care unit who had sepsis or septic
shock, the use of prolonged β-lactam antibiotic infusions was associated with a
reduced risk of 90-day mortality compared with intermittent infusions. The
current evidence presents a high degree of certainty for clinicians to consider
prolonged infusions as a standard of care in the management of sepsis and septic
shock. Trial registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023399434.
Weniger anzeigen
Brenda M McGrath, Hallie C Prescott, Jason Pogue, John P Donnelly, Makoto Jones, Patricia Kipnis, Sarah M Seelye, Theodore J Iwashyna, Vincent X Liu — Annals of the American Thoracic Society
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Rationale: Shorter time-to-antibiotics is lifesaving in sepsis, but programs to
hasten antibiotic delivery may increase unnecessary antibiotic use and adverse
events. Objectives: We sought to estimate both the benefits and harms of
shortening time-to-antibiotics for sepsis. Methods: We conducted a simulation
study using a cohort of 1,559,523 hospitalized patients admitted through the
emergency department with…
Rationale: Shorter time-to-antibiotics is lifesaving in sepsis, but programs to
hasten antibiotic delivery may increase unnecessary antibiotic use and adverse
events. Objectives: We sought to estimate both the benefits and harms of
shortening time-to-antibiotics for sepsis. Methods: We conducted a simulation
study using a cohort of 1,559,523 hospitalized patients admitted through the
emergency department with meeting two or more systemic inflammatory response
syndrome criteria (2013-2018). Reasons for hospitalization were classified as
septic shock, sepsis, infection, antibiotics stopped early, and never treated
(no antibiotics within 48 h). We simulated the impact of a 50% reduction in
time-to-antibiotics for sepsis across 12 hospital scenarios defined by sepsis
prevalence (low, medium, or high) and magnitude of „spillover“ antibiotic
prescribing to patients without infection (low, medium, high, or very high).
Outcomes included mortality and adverse events potentially attributable to
antibiotics (e.g., allergy, organ dysfunction, Clostridiodes difficile
infection, and culture with multidrug-resistant organism). Results: A total of
933,458 (59.9%) hospitalized patients received antimicrobial therapy within 48
hours of presentation, including 38,572 (2.5%) with septic shock, 276,082
(17.7%) with sepsis, 370,705 (23.8%) with infection, and 248,099 (15.9%) with
antibiotics stopped early. A total of 199,937 (12.8%) hospitalized patients
experienced an adverse event; most commonly, acute liver injury (5.6%), new MDRO
(3.5%), and Clostridiodes difficile infection (1.7%). Across the scenarios, a
50% reduction in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis was associated with a median of
1 to 180 additional antibiotic-treated patients and zero to seven additional
adverse events per death averted from sepsis. Conclusions: The impacts of faster
time-to-antibiotics for sepsis vary markedly across simulated hospital types.
However, even in the worst-case scenario, new antibiotic-associated adverse
events were rare.
Weniger anzeigen
Alasdair Gray, Ann Hoskins, Anthony Gildea, Barry Murphy-Jones, Caroline Mulvihill, Emma McFarlane, Erum Khan, Giovanni Satta, guideline committee, Mervyn Singer — BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Brian Reichman, Gil Klinger, Kei Lui, Kjell Helenius, Malcolm Battin, Mark Adams, Maximo Vento, Mikael Norman, Satoshi Kusuda, Tetsuya Isayama — Neonatology
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Introduction: Despite advances in neonatal care, late-onset sepsis remains an
important cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Neonatal late-onset
sepsis rates have decreased in some countries, while in others they have not.
Our objective was to compare trends in late-onset sepsis rates in 9
population-based networks from 10 countries and to assess the associated
mortality…
Introduction: Despite advances in neonatal care, late-onset sepsis remains an
important cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Neonatal late-onset
sepsis rates have decreased in some countries, while in others they have not.
Our objective was to compare trends in late-onset sepsis rates in 9
population-based networks from 10 countries and to assess the associated
mortality within 7 days of late-onset sepsis. Methods: We performed a
retrospective population-based cohort study. Infants born at 24-28 weeks‘
gestation between 2007 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Late-onset sepsis
was defined as a positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture. Late-onset
sepsis rates were calculated for 3 epochs (2007-11, 2012-15, and 2016-19).
Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for late-onset sepsis were calculated for each
network. Results: Of a total of 82,850 infants, 16,914 (20.4%) had late-onset
sepsis, with Japan having the lowest rate (7.1%) and Spain the highest (44.6%).
Late-onset sepsis rates decreased in most networks and remained unchanged in a
few. Israel, Sweden, and Finland showed the largest decrease in late-onset
sepsis rates. The aRRs for late-onset sepsis showed wide variations between
networks. The rate of mortality temporally related to late-onset sepsis was
10.9%. The adjusted mean length of stay for infants with late-onset sepsis was
increased by 5-18 days compared to infants with no late-onset sepsis.
Conclusions: One in 5 neonates of 24-28 weeks‘ gestation develops late-onset
sepsis. Wide variability in late-onset sepsis rates exists between networks with
most networks exhibiting improvement. Late-onset sepsis was associated with
increased mortality and length of stay.
Weniger anzeigen
Alasdair J Gray, John Cafferkey et al., Julia Grahamslaw, Katherine Oatey, Sîan Irvine — Critical Care Medicine
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Objectives: International guidelines recommend IV crystalloid as the primary
fluid for sepsis resuscitation, with 5% human albumin solution (HAS) as the
second line. However, it is unclear which fluid has superior clinical
effectiveness. We conducted a trial to assess the feasibility of delivering a
randomized controlled trial comparing balanced crystalloid against 5% HAS as
sole…
Objectives: International guidelines recommend IV crystalloid as the primary
fluid for sepsis resuscitation, with 5% human albumin solution (HAS) as the
second line. However, it is unclear which fluid has superior clinical
effectiveness. We conducted a trial to assess the feasibility of delivering a
randomized controlled trial comparing balanced crystalloid against 5% HAS as
sole early resuscitation fluid in patients with sepsis presenting to hospital.
Design: Multicenter, open, parallel-group randomized feasibility trial. Setting:
Emergency departments (EDs) in 15 U.K. National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.
Patients: Adult patients with sepsis and a National Early Warning Score 2
greater than or equal to five requiring IV fluids withing one hour of
randomization. Interventions: IV fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloid
or 5% HAS for the first 6 hours following randomization. Measurements and main
results: Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate and 30-day
mortality. We successfully recruited 301 participants over 12 months. Mean (sd)
age was 69 years (± 16 yr), and 151 (50%) were male. From 1303 participants
screened; 502 participants were potentially eligible and 300 randomized to
receive trial intervention with greater than 95% of participants receiving the
intervention. The median number of participants per site was 19 (range, 1-63).
Thirty-day mortality was 17.9% (n = 53). Thirty-one participants died (21.1%)
within 30 days in the 5% HAS arm, compared with 22 participants (14.8%) in the
crystalloid arm (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CIs, 0.84-2.83). Conclusions:
Our results suggest it is feasible to recruit critically ill patients to a fluid
resuscitation trial in U.K. EDs using 5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid.
There was lower mortality in the balanced crystalloid arm. Given these findings,
a definitive trial is likely to be deliverable, but the point estimates suggest
such a trial would be unlikely to demonstrate a significant benefit from using
5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid in sepsis.
Weniger anzeigen
Adam Linder, Anton Nilsson, Attila Frigyesi, Hanna Wetterberg, Jonas Sundén-Cullberg, Malin Inghammar, Maria Lengquist — Open forum infectious diseases
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Background: Survivors of sepsis may experience long-term risk of increased
morbidity and mortality, but estimations of cause-specific effects beyond 1 year
after a sepsis episode are lacking. Method: This nationwide population-based
cohort study linked data from national registers to compare patients aged ≥18
years in Sweden admitted to an intensive care unit from 2008…
Background: Survivors of sepsis may experience long-term risk of increased
morbidity and mortality, but estimations of cause-specific effects beyond 1 year
after a sepsis episode are lacking. Method: This nationwide population-based
cohort study linked data from national registers to compare patients aged ≥18
years in Sweden admitted to an intensive care unit from 2008 to 2019 with severe
community-acquired sepsis. Patients were identified through the Swedish
Intensive Care Registry, and randomly selected population controls were matched
for age, sex, calendar year, and county of residence. Confounding from
comorbidities, health care use, and socioeconomic and demographic factors was
accounted for by using entropy-balancing methods. Long-term mortality and
readmission rates, total and cause specific, were compared for 20 313 patients
with sepsis and 396 976 controls via Cox regression. Results: During the total
follow-up period, 56% of patients with sepsis died, as opposed to 26% of the
weighted controls. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was attenuated with
time but remained elevated in all periods: 3.0 (95% CI, 2.8-3.2) at 2 to 12
months after admission, 1.8 to 1.9 between 1 and 5 years, and 1.6 (95% CI,
1.5-1.8) at >5 years. The major causes of death and readmission among the sepsis
cases were infectious diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. The hazard
ratios were larger among those without underlying comorbidities. Conclusions:
Severe community-acquired sepsis was associated with substantial long-term
effects beyond 1 year, as measured by mortality and rehospitalization. The
cause-specific rates indicate the importance of underlying or undetected
comorbidities while suggesting that survivors of sepsis may face increased
long-term mortality and morbidity not explained by underlying health factors.
Keywords: epidemiology, long-term, mortality, readmission, sepsis
Weniger anzeigen
Alexander M Friedman, Dena Goffman, Jean-Ju Sheen, Lilly Y Liu, Lisa Nathan, Mary E D'Alton, Mirella Mourad, Timothy Wen, Uma M Reddy — Obstetrics and gynecology
★★★★☆
2024
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, timing, clinical risk factors, and
adverse outcomes associated with postpartum readmissions for maternal sepsis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations
and 60-day postpartum readmissions for females aged 15-54 years with and without
sepsis using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Temporal trends in
sepsis diagnoses during delivery…
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, timing, clinical risk factors, and
adverse outcomes associated with postpartum readmissions for maternal sepsis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations
and 60-day postpartum readmissions for females aged 15-54 years with and without
sepsis using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Temporal trends in
sepsis diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum
readmissions were analyzed with the National Cancer Institute’s Joinpoint
Regression Program to estimate the average annual percent change with 95% CIs.
Logistic regression models were fit to determine whether delivery
hospitalization characteristics were associated with postpartum sepsis
readmissions, and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were
reported. Adverse outcomes associated with sepsis during delivery
hospitalization and readmission were described, including death, severe
morbidity, a critical care composite, and renal failure. Results: Overall,
15,268,190 delivery hospitalizations and 256,216 associated 60-day readmissions
were included after population weighting, of which 16,399 (1.1/1,000 delivery
hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis at delivery, and 20,130
(1.3/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis with
postpartum readmission. A sepsis diagnosis was present in 7.9% of all postpartum
readmissions. Characteristics associated with postpartum sepsis readmission
included younger age at delivery, Medicaid insurance, lowest median ZIP code
income quartile, and chronic medical conditions such as obesity, pregestational
diabetes, and chronic hypertension. Postpartum sepsis readmissions were
associated with infection during the delivery hospitalization, including
intra-amniotic infection or endometritis, wound infection, and delivery sepsis.
Sepsis diagnoses were associated with 24.4% of maternal deaths at delivery and
38.4% postpartum, 2.2% cases of nontransfusion severe morbidity excluding sepsis
at delivery and 13.6% postpartum, 15.6% of critical care composite diagnoses at
delivery and 30.1% postpartum, and 11.1% of acute renal failure diagnoses at
delivery and 36.4% postpartum. Conclusion: Sepsis accounts for a significant
proportion of postpartum readmissions and is a major contributor to adverse
outcomes during delivery hospitalizations and postpartum readmissions.
Weniger anzeigen